American Policy that Best Describes Response to Terrorism
Prior to 9/11, terrorism was just another key problem in American policy and different agencies were tasked to curtail its growth and influence - whether it is domestic or international terrorism. 9/11 changed the landscape to the point of having an all-source, central governing body that ensures 24/7 monitoring, prevention and stopping of all terrorist activities. The agency is the Department of Homeland Security tasked "to coordinate defense against, and responses to, terrorist attacks on U.S. soil combining border control and consequence management functions as well as a coordinating entity - the
The campaign involved rallying the international community, especially law enforcement and intelligence components (Perl, 2003). administration has been seen to have instituted a "swift, wide-ranging and decisive (Perl, 2003)" action plan that best responds to terrorist threats. " By aggregating the counterterrorism and anti-terrorism functions into one superbody, the previous problems with jurisdiction and "turf wars" amongst the FBI, DEA, ATF and other state and local police, intelligence and law enforcements agencies were solve. By combining all its resources into a single cabinet-level agency, the U. " This is quite evident in the present crisis in Iraq where President Bush wanted to increase U. Some sectors in the society - especially Muslims and Arabs - state that; "The method the American administration has used in the war against terror may have complicated the situation even more (Cochrane, 2004). Hence, American policy in combating terrorists and terrorism responded with a centralized collection, investigation and implementation agency that ensures all avenues are managed to contain the global threats of this 21st century menace. military presence despite the tolls the war on Iraq have taken not only on American lives but on the social, political and economic arena. It is best for President Bush to use the powers his office in using the "military solution" as a last resort rather than a "first strike" measure. National Office for Combating Terrorism - with broad international responsibilities (Perl, 2003). But despite this noteworthy action, American policy should still look at the root causes of some of the terrorist actions against itself and its citizens. The current administration's policy may mean well but the implementation has shown varying degrees of flaws, and it is high time for the Bush Administration to look at other means of amending American policy on terrorism that would come out with more viable social, political and economic solutions without continuing the military onslaught.
Common topics in this essay:
Hence American,
,
President Bush,
Homeland Security,
Combating Terrorism,
Bush Administration,
Muslims Arabs,
DEA ATF,
Iraq American,
american policy,
perl 2003,
social political,
political economic,
president bush,
social political economic,
|
Acceptance Essays
