Feedback Form

Get immediate access to thousands of

 high quality papers and essays.
Mega Essays Home  |   Questions?  |   Acceptable Use  |   Customer Care  |   Site Search
    Enter Essay Topic:

   

    Subjects:
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology

    Login:
Member Login
Join Now!
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

Grand Canyon

I'm an expert on the Grand Canyon, because I had a relative who worked there and have visited many times. The Wikipedia entry on the Grand Canyon is accurate, but it does contain some misinformation. For example, the lead paragraph says it was carved by the Colorado River and its tributaries, which is true, but erosion has also helped carve the Canyon and create the many buttes and monuments throughout the canyon. This is not addressed until the "geology" section, and there is it not very clear. In addition, architect Mary Co


In addition, it says one of the popular activities at the Canyon is "running. A traditional encyclopedia would have fact checkers to help ensure all of the entry was correct, and it is clear this entry has omissions and errors. The Hopi House history also does not give her credit for designing the building, and says it was built by Hopi Indians. Much of the interest in the Canyon is tourist related, and there is very little information here that addresses that, although the entry does give links to that information. I would recommend this entry with some reservations, as I've noted. They aided in the design and building, but I do not believe the building was entirely built by Hopis. There are some inaccuracies, and I believe information from a traditional encyclopedia or even the National Park Service Web site, would be more accurate and informative. I did see bias in the entry; it covered history, Native American tribes of the area, archaeology, and buildings. However, there is a section discussing the present Park Superintendent, and a discussion of a "creationist" book being sold in the Grand Canyon Bookstore, which does not seem to belong in this entry at all. lter is listed as a "settler" of Phantom Ranch, when in reality she designed the buildings at Phantom, but never "settled" there. I believe a traditional encyclopedia would make more sense, and give a better feel for the geology and history of the Canyon, as well. " Hiking maybe, but at high altitudes, such as the Canyon, running is much more difficult than at lower elevations.

Common topics in this essay:
Service Web, Hopi Indians, Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Canyon Bookstore, Hopi House, Native American, Phantom Ranch, Park Superintendent, Mary Colter, grand canyon, traditional encyclopedia, canyon running, information traditional, information traditional encyclopedia,

See the rest of the paper. Join Now!

Approximate Word count = 357
Approximate Pages = 1 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here

More Essays on Grand Canyon


Student Papers:
Grand Canyon 1493 words
Grand Canyon 762 words
Grand Canyon 2068 words
Grand Canyon 325 words
the grand canyon 1550 words
Grand Canyon report 462 words

Professional Papers:
The National Parks Service2679 words
USING MUSIC TO TEACH THE BASICS5002 words
WaterRelated Development3608 words
Marc Reisneramp39s Cadillac Desert3608 words
Photographer Ansel Adams1824 words
A Sand County Almanac2150 words

Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900



CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE



Get immediate access to over 100,000
high quality term papers and essays!!!

Webmasters make $$$!



All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright (c) 2001-2009 Mega Essays LLC
All rights reserved. DMCA HMS