Doping Moral Dilemma
The Eric Lamaze case poses an interesting dilemma to the Canadian Olympic Committee. In a state of panic resulting from false information given to him about his removal from the Olympic Team, he began to suffer from intense depression resulting in intoxication and a lapse in judgment in using an illegal substance. While this illegal substance is not one that can be considered to help Mr. Lamaze gain an unfair advantage over the competition, there are rules that athletes have to follow and that the Canadian Olympic Committee must follow to preserve fairness and protect the integrity of the sport. By the very definition, athletes are subject to additional rules and policies affecting even one's personal life and there are standards which an athlete representing Canada in the Olympics must follow. However, in light of the circumstances surrounding Mr. Lamaze's illicit drug use, he should be allowed to compete on the Olympic Team in Sydney. Considering the ethical issues at stake and relevant moral theories, including Rawl's and Kant's ideas, it becomes clear that there is a time when the governing rules of our institution should be weighed in accordance with a greater perspective on the ethical impact. In this light, Mr. Lamaze
Allowing a hard-working athlete who made one mistake that was likely out of his control the opportunity to participate in the Olympics is the most important value. This is what the Canadian Olympic Association has done in allowing Mr. Lamaze is not allowed to go to the Olympics. There are rules and there are consequences for breaking the rules and Mr. Lamaze personally and professionally (CBS Sports 2000). Lamaze may be responsible for his actions, but he was largely under the influence of prevailing factors that made it appear to him that his life was in ruin. Lamaze should not be punished so severely for the actions of that fateful night on his walk to the restroom. It was therefore necessary "to protect the integrity of sport and of the agreement" in preventing Mr. The facts cannot be taken at face value, but rather must be evaluated with greater scrutiny. A consideration of ethical and moral theories will help to illustrate this notion and allow for a better understanding of the ethical issues at question and ultimately show that Mr. Additionally, the use of the illegal drug in question was a one time occurrence in which many factors contributed for a singular lapse in judgment. A norm or value is something that is recognized for its value by society (Dallaire, 2007, Jan.
Common topics in this essay:
Olympic Association,
CBS Sports,
Sydney Olympics,
Jan11 Lamaze,
Lamaze Lamaze,
Lamaze's Additionally,
Lamaze Olympics,
Eric Lamaze,
Lamaze Sydney,
Lamaze Dallaire,
sydney olympics,
dallaire 2007,
2007 jan11,
dallaire 2007 jan11,
canadian olympic,
cbs sports,
cbs sports 2000,
sports 2000,
participate sydney olympics,
participate sydney,
olympic association,
letter law,
canadian olympic association,
ethical issues,
gain unfair advantage,
|
Acceptance Essays
