Article Analysis
1. Determining whether an article is fair depends on a number of things, not the least of which is personal bias. In fact, the bias of the author and the bias of the reader help determine how an article's fairness is perceived. The two articles about OJ Simpson were written from different perspectives, which is no surprise. One of them was an editorial, which was heavy on opinion and speculation, while the other was an informative article, which relied on facts. In addition, one article was written prior to the verdict, the other after the verdict. Despite the different perspectives, both articles appear to be written from a vantage point assuming that Simpson committed the murders of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Simpson. This reader shares that bias because the factual evidence supporting guilt simply appeared too overwhelming for a reasonable person to believe otherwise. As a result, both of the articles seem fair in their treatment of Simpson, though a supporter of Simpson who believed that he did not commit the murders would probably not share that opinion. In The New York Times editorial, the writer's attitude was that Simpson was guilty. He pointed out several instances where Simpson's defense in both the criminal and
The authors again changed tone to indicate possible problems in the pending custody suit, to inject their belief that Simpson would gain custody of his children from the Browns, and to speculate that a favorable custody decision might favorably impact Simpson in the civil suit. As a result, Chang concludes that politicians from across the spectrum can authentically claim Kennedy as their own. Crater went to dinner at Billy Haas's restaurant, where he met a friend, William Klein and his companions. Crater's wife lived outside of New York City and was not with him in New York at the time of his disappearance. She acknowledges that Kennedy engaged in some undesirable behavior, but even the most ardent supporters of Kennedy have been forced to acknowledge that; therefore, that acknowledgement does not reveal her attitude regarding Kennedy. Given that one of the books presented images of Kennedy alongside other popular images, one of the author's points is how the historical memory of a person is largely the result of an intentionally created public image, or at least was during Kennedy's time. He believed that most Americans would support the reasonableness of the civil verdict, and that the civil verdict would not have any impact on people's feelings regarding Simpson's guilt or innocence. The judge ate dinner with the group, and then departed hastily for a theater show. However, not knowing Chang's own political affiliations, it is almost impossible to determine whether or not he has a favorable opinion of Kennedy. They almost seemed to suggest that emotionality could be equated with melodrama, which is unfair. Someone picked up Crater's ticket at will-call, though the theater staff was unable to definitively say whether the man was Crater or not. However, Zelizer's article appears to suggest that the manner in which Kennedy's assassination was captured was almost as significant as the assassination itself. The author provided substantial proof that Simpson was a spousal abuser, including testimony by Simpson's best-friend in which he acknowledged that Nicole Simpson had revealed her history of spousal abuse to him, and that he had previously perjured himself when he denied that Nicole Simpson had ever told him about abuse. Though he was a doting husband, he also engaged in affairs with several chorus girls.
Common topics in this essay:
York Times,
Nicole Simpson,
City York,
Instead Zelizer,
Kennedy President,
William Klein,
Chang Kennedy,
OJ Simpson,
Joseph Crater,
Juditha Brown,
opinion kennedy,
kennedy's presidency,
civil verdict,
crater's disappearance,
nicole simpson,
kennedy's presidency ambiguous,
kennedy's life,
simpson's defense,
simpson's guilt,
difficult ascertain,
judge's disappearance,
|
Acceptance Essays
