red light camera
Many drivers run red lights which cause accidents involving innocent people. Red light cameras have helped many communities enforce traffic laws by photographing vehicles whose drivers have ran red lights. A red light camera system is connected to both the traffic signal and sensors underneath the pavement at the stop line. The system monitors the traffic signal, and whenever a vehicle passes over the sensors after the signal has turned red, the camera captures a photo of the vehicle. Then a second photograph is taken to show if the driver actually made a stop or kept on going. The camera records the date, the time that vehicle ran the red light occurred, and the time elapsed at the beginning of the red signal and the speed of the vehicle. The light that flashes when the photo is taken will produce clear pictures of the vehicle under any condition. The penalty of running a red light is sent in forms of tickets which are mailed to the owners of the vehicle to inform that they were caught on camera violating the traffic law. The city of San Diego should turns back on red light cameras because it will not only reduce red light running but also save many lives.
Then again, drivers should have enough space between them and the next car ahead of them while driving so they can make a stop when needed without colliding. Driving towards an intersection and knowing that it is equipped with the red light camera, makes one think twice before running that red light. To solve this red lights controversial issue, the city makes sure that the company is not falsely distributing tickets, the city should pay the company a flat rate every year. Red light cameras were not just a device that took snapshots of red light runners but also acted as an intimidation to drivers. Although people should not only rely on red light cameras to remind them stop, they should already know from childhood that a red means "stop completely. Another study reveals that the majority of the Americans support the usage of the red light cameras (80 percent in cities with cameras and 76 percent in cities without cameras). For Example, former San Diego Mayor Roger Hedgecock, now a radio talk show host, denounces red-light cameras for increasing the number of rear-end collisions as motorists make sudden stops for short yellow lights. A precaution sign of a red light camera should be placed ahead yards before the intersection to warn drivers about the red light cameras ahead of time. A study by an Institute in Oxnard, California, shows that red light running in the city dropped 42 percent after cameras were up in only 9 intersections. In addition, people should already know that it is their duty to keep a safe environment for the members of their community. Also another flaw was that the red light camera causes drivers to make sudden stops at proceeding yellow lights that created more rear end collisions which is one other type of car accidents. Critics point out that the first generation of red light cameras was faulty. Even though we were taught that red meant "stop" and green meant "go" at a young age, why is it that when we reach the age limit to drive, we forget this theory and in turn, cause Nguyen 3traffic accidents and endanger other human lives? Turning off the red light cameras was a major mistake. " As children, we were taught that red was to stop and green was to go.
Common topics in this essay:
United Kingdom,
Light Cameras,
Roger Hedgecock,
Oxnard California,
red light,
San Diego,
Martin IMS,
light cameras,
red light cameras,
light camera,
red light camera,
red light running,
yellow lights,
san diego,
light running,
red lights,
percent cities,
short yellow lights,
percent cities cameras,
drivers red,
ran red,
|
Acceptance Essays
