Analysis on Intelligence Support Needed for HLS to Prevent Terrorism
1.Analyze and discuss the intelligence support needed to HLS to prevent terrorism.Homeland security needs an all-encompassing and single point clearing house for intelligence services and support. The centralized requirement will ensure that the "big picture" is always clear, and informing the big picture, the details are collected and collated from the various intelligence units. The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security (DNS) is a good starting point because the United States now has an organization with over 20 federal entities that can focus on "three national security priorities: preventing terrorist attacks within the United States; reducing America's vulnerability to terrorism; and minimizing the damage and facilitating the recovery from attacks that do occur (The White House, 2006)." Aside from the establishment of the DHS, intelligence support can now be achieved with the reorganization of the American Intelligence community "endowed with expanded budgetary, acquisition, tasking, and personnel authorities to integrate more effectively the efforts of the Community into a more unified, coordinated, and effective whole (The White House, 2006.)2.Describe and assess the intelligence available before the 9/
As a point of policy, "terrorism was not the overriding national security concern for the U. (National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, 2004)"4. Aside from this, the United States still has a wide area wherein undetected border crossings can be done on the Canadian or Mexican side of the border. Two recommendations of the 9/11 Commission are critical: "(1) Congress should create a single, principal point of oversight and review for homeland security. The military had their hands tied as a result of the policymakers not understanding the situation that "hen they briefed policymakers, the military presented both the pros and cons of those strike options and the associated risks. " There was internal compartmentalization between agencies thus; the big intelligence picture was not clear as a result of each intelligence-mandated agency holding a piece of the puzzle or mosaic. Officials in both the Clinton and Bush administrations regarded a full U. Policymakers expressed frustration with the range of options presented. As stated in the report: "The Congress, like the executive branch, responded slowly to the rise of transnational terrorism as a threat to national security. Despite increase in border and immigration controls, this is still an avenue of approach for terrorists because forged documents are still available in the market. (National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, 2004)" This simply means that there should and must always be readiness in facing any and all threats to the United States especially in the nature of the terrorist attack. government under either the Clinton or the pre-9/11 Bush administration.
Common topics in this essay:
Attacks United,
White House,
Canadian Mexican,
,
Security DNS,
American Intelligence,
Clinton Bush,
Northern Command's,
terrorist attacks,
Aside United,
Department Defense,
attacks united,
terrorist attacks united,
attacks united 2004,
homeland security,
united 2004,
9/11 attack,
national commission,
national commission terrorist,
commission terrorist attacks,
commission terrorist,
political military,
national security,
vulnerabilities strategic surprise,
9/11 commission,
|
Acceptance Essays
