Abortion: Pro Life, Pro Choice
There are numerous controversial topics and issues that abound in the modern world. Some of these test the limits of our morals and ethics that it is sometimes difficult to determine what is black or white as a result of varying shades of gray. Abortion is one topic that has seen the battle lines drawn between the pro-choice and the pro-life. It is difficult to fathom who's who is correct because each side have valid points that support their assertions. In the ensuing debate between the two, violent acts have often been committed only to prove the point of the proponents of each belief.The basic premise of the pro-lifers is that life is precious and it is a gift from a supernatural being that controls the lives of all living and non-living things. For those with religious convictions, this supernatural being is known as God and in one of the teachings, "Thou shalt not kill" is an absolute command for those
Respect of one another's opinion is important especially in a topic that is controversial. For the pro-choice, it boils down to the woman making a decision on what should, will and must go on with her body. But if either side could not bear hear the other's arguments, it is best to stay on their neutral corners and live with their belief without antagonizing the other. The pro-lifers may think that the pro-choice advocate is being selfish and uncaring about life but the latter is only exercising her freedom of choice and right to exercise such freedom. Never mind too that continuing the pregnancy will cause death to either the child or the mother because obeying the "thou shalt not kill" commandment is of greater importance and whatever happens to either unborn child or mother is God's will. For the firm believer, this is an absolute and clear direction of not hurting a human being especially one that is still in the womb of a mother. If the perceiver is pro-life, then the bias is against the pro-choice. This is not to say that the pro-choicer was lackadaisical in making the decision but rather her decision was based on informed consent with all available options considered. Seeing both sides of the arguments proved that either side has valid points but which is right or wrong can still be determined based on perception. If she gets pregnant and she believes it is not yet the right time to have a baby, it is her right to terminate pregnancy rather than continue with it and be unable to support the child. Thus, the argument would never end but in arguing, there should be an "agreement to disagree" and neither side should result to violent means in order to get their points across. Call it baby or a fetus, the growing life inside is still and will always be for the pro-lifers a human being deserving protection by all means. Never mind if the pregnancy is caused by incest or rape, or there is already an abnormality in the growing fetus that continuing the pregnancy will born an debilitated child needing close care the rest of his life. It will not be dictated by religious groups or the society but rather with her decision based on informed consent.
Common topics in this essay:
,
based informed consent,
thou shalt kill,
decision based informed,
shalt kill,
child mother,
informed consent,
decision based,
thou shalt,
continuing pregnancy,
based informed,
|
Acceptance Essays
