A National Health Care System
1. Of course, those who are uninsured are the first to benefit from a national health care system, because they gain access to health care they could not afford before. Many businesses would benefit too, because their health plan costs would reduce, and that means lower costs for many products and services. Many health care facilities would benefit as well, because their paperwork and insurance processing would be reduced to one entity. One study shows, however, that because of free health care in Canada, more people seek treatment, so there are longer waits for treatment, and more people actually suffer from some diseases, which is certainly not a benefit (O'Neill, and O'Neill, 2007). This would certainly be a concern, so one way to make sure everyone benefits from the plan would be to ensure there are enough participating locations and specialists to ensure timely care for everyone.2. At first, it would seem that a national health care plan would have a very positive effect on most businesses. They could cover
Mandates, however, would be difficult to prove and implement, and so, mandating health care might be more of a burden than a blessing. 1 percent (2 times the inflation rate), in 2007 ("Health insurance costs," 2008). One physicians group notes, "[P]rivate insurance bureaucracy and paperwork consume one-third (31 percent) of every health care dollar" ("Our mission," 2008). National health care would be similar to Medicare (which is essentially national health care for the elderly, and few seem to have qualms about that), and while there are inherent problems in any government system, ensuring health care for everyone, regardless of income, is something the country has ignored for far too long. Health care might end up being more expensive for entrepreneurs, but most successful entrepreneurs carry their own health insurance anyway, so a new system might actually benefit them, as well. With more controls, perhaps the prices would stabilize, rather than rising by 6. their employees in the national health care system as a benefit, and probably at a reduced rate from the insurance premiums they are paying now, which would be a win-win situation for employee and employer. Perhaps that is why so many physicians support a single-payer system of national health care. Right now, the special interests have free reign, and seem to be able to push their legislation through no matter what. Socializing medicine is not an experiment at all. I do not believe my lifestyle is "toyed" with regarding national health care, rather I welcome it to help reign in the insurance and pharmaceutical companies who seem to have free reign in Washington and in setting sky-high profits at the expense of those who cannot afford access to health care. It would seem, on the surface at least, that expanding national health care would be better for most Americans, and it might eliminate some of the politics and special interest opportunities, especially if the program included some kind of pricing limits or regulations. Most other prosperous industrialized nations have had national health care for years; the United States is the only country that does not.
Common topics in this essay:
O'Neill O'Neill,
,
health care,
national health,
national health care,
health care system,
access health care,
health care industry,
care industry,
access health,
care system,
free reign,
health insurance,
|
Acceptance Essays
