Collective Bargaining
"There is strength in numbers" is a popular cliche, and could quite possibly be considered a proverb. It is something that most of us have heard throughout our lives. It also lies at the heart of collective bargaining, and provides a reasonable, although simplistic reason for the use of collective bargaining, and is a good indication of where and for whom it is most useful. Collective bargainings' origins lie in one of man's primary instincts: defense. In industrial relations context this is defense of proper working conditions, secure and proper pay. Collective bargaining allowed this by gaining pay increases through increased power of the workers as a joint force. In this context collective bargaining is more of an economic and political invention which has influence on the social aspects of employment and living. Collective bargaining is most likely considered a great social invention simply because it provides more economic stability. Collective bargaining in its most basic form is the process by which an organization or group of employees, in the form of trade unions, negotiate with employers. They also associate with representatives in relation to any aspect of employment with employer's organization. The in
(Fazio, 420) The stability of the agreements has provided management with a situation that makes them capable of being reasonably sure of what is coming and can plan ahead based on that. (Purcell, 225) These things will make workers more content while minimizing conflict and inducing a feeling of stability within the company. It is only recently that social issues have been included in the negotiations in collective bargaining. It is not only in an Irish context that collective bargaining has been the desecrating affect of the social aspects of the economy. It is also focused on dealing more fairly with grievances and increasing productivity. Lower investment means that fewer jobs are created, unemployment rises and welfare payments increase and possibly increase the national debt. If areas of interest are maximized, and stressed in the collective bargaining process, this can reinforce an acceptance of common interest by the workforce. Following these consequences there would be less money in the economy overall. In a social context, the consequences of this system is regulation of industrial conflict. It does tend to contradict the optimistic Marxist view of unions and collective bargaining as being a school for socialism and a potential revolution of the workforce. (McCall, 21) It has proved to be desirable on their tax burden. This form of planning ahead has a significant progress record in the areas of debt reduction, social welfare, and taxation. Overall the PNR proved to be a successful venture, although it was helped along by the late eighties. It is not now nor will it ever be a revolutionary force. This change in focus has led collective bargaining away form the adversarial win-lose situation to a more cooperative model, with unions and the workforce working together to achieve common goals.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Union Employers,
Overall PNR,
Wage Agreements,
collective bargaining,
trade unions,
pay increases,
parties negotiation feel,
collective bargaining form,
collective bargaining process,
context collective bargaining,
collective bargaining provides,
parties negotiation,
social aspects,
social invention,
negotiation feel,
bargaining form,
national wage,
social issues,
|
Acceptance Essays
