Introduction
The death penalty has been a subject of controversy in the American
justice system for many years. This form of capital punishment is usually a
sentence decided by a jury. The imperfections of our court system have risen
an ethical dilemma regarding the consequences of such a severe punishment.
There is strong support towards the death penalty, as well as extreme opposition
towards it. This debate has been going on, and probably will continue to go on,
for many years. It is hard to believe that the death penalty is considered
necessary, with so much at stake, when there are other punishments that do
The Moral Dilemma
The moral debate of the death penalty can obviously be looked at from two
sides. Those in favor might have these type of views;
Glass (2003) has suggested that sometimes, taking a life as punishment
and deterring those who would take the lives of others without any remorse, is a
necessary step, even if it might seem immoral. Supporting the death penalty
could inevitably mean, that innocent people are executed, but the judicial system
is not perfect. So it is better for society to take a stand for those victimized and
punish the guilty under the best system devised. Rather than allowing savage
killers to go essentially unpunished and be free to continue their crimes.
As a practice, the death penalty is often considered racist, inconsistent
and unjust, based on little more that the personal view of a group of jurors with
minimal education. In theory, it's not necessarily immoral if the convicted is
indeed guilty and has forfeited his/her right to life by taking another. The fact that
a murder shows a potential to do good, or endured a bad childhood, does not
outweigh the crime. A life shouldn't be spared out of compassion when ...