Capitol Punishment
Is trying to teach criminals the lesson that killing is wrong by, in turn, killing them right? Capital punishment has now been abolished in most countries and should not be introduced into Australia. The probability of wrongfully executing a person and later finding their innocence is overwhelmingly high and the few governments who do employ the 'death penalty' wrongfully believe that it deters criminals from committing crimes. If a loved one is murdered and his family feels justice in having the murderer murdered, wouldn't this then make the family murderers?There have many countless arguments for capitol punishment. It is a deterrent. It removes killers. It is the ultimate punishment. It satisfies the public's need for retribution. Realistically, imposing the death penalty is expensive and time consuming. Morally, it is a continuation of the cycle of violence and degrades all who are involved in its enforcement.If a person is sentenced to the death penalty and later found innocent, the outcome is horrific for
The jury and judge who put this person to death would also have guilt hanging over their heads for the rest of their careers, I'm sure. The family of the victim are left for the rest of their life to deal, knowing that their family member was innocent and still killed because of a mistake. Man is not the divine being and having said that, no person has the power to take the life of another, no matter what. If anything, by forcing families to seek the death penalty, their own consciences will be burdened by the death of the killer. Take for example; a black man kills a white man. In the times when capital punishment was common, the value of life was a lot less, and societies were more barbaric and capital punishment was probably quite acceptable. In fact the cost of the execution process expenses including trial court costs, post-conviction costs, and prison costs while served on death row awaiting execution exceed $2 million. This essay has attempted to state that the racial and biased standings, exceeding costs and the barbaric nature simply deduct from the possibility of capital punishment ever being introduced into Australia. It would be impossible to rid the system of racial and social bias. They also believe that the death sentence is torture and no government has the right to torture his citizens. The cost of a 20-year jail sentence costs around $300,000. After such occurrences it makes one question the judicial system and its safeness. The killing of murderer will not bring back the victim. Governments may believe that capital punishment is a righteous choice because of their responsibility to protect the safety of society.
Common topics in this essay:
Capital Punishment,
Amnesty International,
death penalty,
capital punishment,
killing murderer,
penalty expensive,
kills white,
introduced australia,
death penalty expensive,
|
Acceptance Essays
