The topic of war can bring many opinions and judgments. In this essay I will be talking about the affects it has on our economy. Some think that war is good for our economy and in the short run, they may be correct. In terms of economics, the government tends to do what is best for the short-term and for what immediately benefits a few sectors of the population rather than practicing "good economics." Due to the shortsightedness of the government, this adds to the fabrication of war being helpful. More often than not, due to this inability to look beyond the present, many citizens suffer from foolish economic policies implemented by these shortsighted politicians. The way specific people suffer varies. Some may lose their house, working ability, family member(s), etc., all of which cause economic and emotional damage during and after the war. It takes money and time away from people and institutions.
             In the long run, statistics prove that war creates more economic problems than it solves for both the public and for individuals. Good Economists would see that war is not good for the economy; it is a set back. During the time of war, the government tends to take more control of the economy to pay for its costs. War is expensive. Who pays for the war? We do, the citizens.
             Large sums diverted to a war effort equals less money spending on business or social sectors that benefit public welfare and the economy. The Glass Pane theory states that money given to one area is money taken away from another. Therefore, in wartime, money that is put into the war effort is thus taken away from other areas of the economy, thus harming the general and/or overall economy. One need only look at all the jobs and production it takes away from society by having to rebuild after war and to pay for the war to see the devastating effects it has on our society.
             The "pro" side of war states that after mass destruction
             ...