Morality of War
In the wake of the destruction of September 11th, 2001, the United States of America were faced with an insecure future. With massive amounts of anti-American sentiments present all over the world, along with the growing threat of more terrorism against the US, President George W. Bush was forced to make a decision on whether or not to send the country to war. The war in Iraq was morally justified because Bush had a moral obligation to protect the interests of US citizens. Iraq presented a great threat to the United States as a whole, with the weapons of mass destruction that American allies believed to exist, posing destruction of insurmountable amounts if utilized by Saddam Hussein against American lives. Hussein, the leader of Iraq, had been killing massive amounts of his citizens in genocide as well. Bush had enough evidence to know that American lives were threatened, so his decision to go to war with Iraq was morally justified. The United States had been subject to terrorism from other countries in the Middle East for years, most notably the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11. To protect the US from further attacks from the Middle East, Bush led the country into war to put a stop to the terror. I
Invading Iraq provides the greatest benefits overall for the mental, physical, and economic states of US citizens. When the US invaded the country, they found opulent palaces filled with riches, while the rest of the country looked destitute. Also, during the course of the war, US forces tried to keep casualties to a minimum. The UN was basically paralyzed due to politics and bureaucratic issues. Iraq was a better choice than North Korea, a much stronger country, and would have cost thousands more American lives if Bush had gone to war against North Korea. With past economic sanctions in the country, the poor citizens seemed to only get poorer, while Hussein and his government seemed to wallow in the lap of luxury. With no strong military, Iraq was considered a push-over country that could easily be taken without great loss of American or Iraqi life. Another argument for nonviolence is a nonviolent resolution, not war. By invading Iraq and curbing the threat of terrorism, countless innocent lives may have been saved. In war, there are always casualties, but in this case, war was necessary to prevent the loss of other innocent citizens in greater quantities as time progressed. This is unjustifiable because the US had to go around the UN if anything was to be done about terrorism. These would only hurt the citizens of the country, the common people. By fighting fire with fire, the US contained the violence to one incident as opposed to many. Economic sanctions would harm the country's people, but not the government. Smart bombs and other precautionary measures tried to protect innocent lives while taking over the Iraqi government.
Common topics in this essay:
North Korea,
Iraq America,
Iraq Bush,
Invading Iraq,
George Bush,
Iraq UN,
Hussein American,
United America,
war iraq,
East Bush,
morally justified,
Morality War,
iraq morally,
innocent lives,
invading iraq,
war iraq morally,
iraq morally justified,
weapons mass destruction,
american lives,
weapons mass,
economic sanctions,
mass destruction,
morality war,
world invading iraq,
innocent lives saved,
|
Acceptance Essays
