Feedback Form
Quality
Research
Material!

Shane Warne

The issue of whether Shane Warne deserved a punishment for taking a diuretic has been widely debated in our community recently. It is an important issue because it concerns fundamental moral and social questions about the topic surrounding the controversy, that is, drugs in sport. There are a variety of views on the politics behind drug use in sport, and many arguments put forward about the matter of Shane’s punishment for using an illegal substance. The question on everyone’s mind is, did Shane deserve a punishment? Although there are a number of opinions on the matter, there is only one logical thesis; Shane Warne’s punishment for performing a prohibited act was a suitable and fair adjudication.

. . .

The sporting world as we know it today would spawn into a corrupt arbitrary environment, eliminating any chance of a competitive bout. It would transform the sporting world into a diuretic haven.

It was not unexpected that Shane would again make a mistake, and the consumption of a diuretic fitted in nicely with his succession of discrepancies. The national sports hero has been caught out in numerous embarrassing scandals, including bookmaking and a phone-sex incident. These regrettable encounters were brought about by Shane’s uncanny lack of ability to decide right from wrong, they labeled him an ignorant simpleton. At the same time however, the punishment was considerately fair to Shane’s uniquely individual case. The moment Shane put a banned substance in his mouth, the moment he became a drug cheat, and, consequently had to be punished for his actions. Shane is well known on the cricket field through his talent, and, he is equally well known off the field for his larrikin behaviour. Of course not everyone conceives this view on the issue.

Shane Warne is a unique individual. He is arguably the best cricket player in the world who has contributed to cricket greatly, both on a national and international scale. In conjunction with his contribution to cricket, Shane’s ignorance was his only refuge from the recommended minimum two-year ban. Athletes would be free to use illegal performance-enhancing substances with the luxury of knowing that the utilized diuretic will be their failsafe. He did not know the difference between right and wrong and was therefore given a suitable and fair penalty of a reduced ban. The one-year ban wasn’t just mandatory to discipline Shane, but also to protect the future from similar incidences occurring.

Approximate Word count = 490
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE
Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.
Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

All research is for reference purposes only.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC, All rights reserved. DMCA