Engineering ethics
As an engineer and as a human being, human safety should always come first. Companies should not put the amount of money they could make ahead of the safety of the people they could be putting at risk. I would advocate for the use of site b, because safety should be the number one priority to companies. Sometimes companies do not put safety first and there have been dire effects because of this, like unsafe cars or faulty baby swings. With almost every engineering proposition there is going to good and bad effects accompanying the different paths that can be taken. In Deborah G. Johnson's article "the Social and Pr
Engineers should not be "guns for hire" and always do what would maximize the outcome; they should be looking out for the "good of humanity"[1]. If I had to make the decision of where to put the cell phone tower I would undeniably recommend the building of site b. Money should never be placed in higher value than human life. This problem is along the same lines as the cell tower problem, should benefits have to be sacrificed in order to ensure the health of humanity? Johnson argues "We want. Building on site A would be a purely consequence oriented approach, and the ends would definitely not justify the means. This is another case where the ends do not justify the means, but Thomas Murray, the atomic energy commissioner, didn't see it that way. In Terry Tempest Williams "Clan of the one breasted women" the government tested atomic bombs in Nevada, and several families were affected, with many women dying because of breast cancer. Although we don't know if it would cause any harm to the community it is better to be safe than to expose people to radiation. Is it that big of deal to put people at risk so cell phone users can increase their roaming capabilities by thirty percent?. engineers committed to the safety and human well- being" [1], if we want to be safe then we should always should put the "site b" over the "site a" whenever possible. Murray said "Gentlemen, we must not let anything interfere with this series of tests, nothing" [2], this clearly shows why we shouldn't put the consequences ahead of human life. And as an engineer I would have to look out for the safety of humanity. ofessional Responsibility of Engineers", Samuel Florman gives the example "Should we risk oil spills and increase our reserves by offshore drilling?" [1].
Common topics in this essay:
Murray Gentlemen,
Samuel Florman,
,
Williams Clan,
Thomas Murray,
Deborah Johnson's,
justify means,
cell phone,
building site,
human life,
|
Acceptance Essays
