Jimmy Carter: A Vision for Pea

James Earl Carter, the thirty-ninth elected President of the United States of America, will go down in history as the first, and possibly only, Western leader who brokered a peace deal between an Arab country and the Jewish State of Israel, to the satisfaction of both parties. Be it the Jordanian-Israeli peace treaty, brokered by President Ronald Reagan, or the Oslo Agreement, by President George Bush Sr., the concerned parties claim that they received an unfair deal. The Israeli-Jordanian Peace Accords, largely distributed the disputed waters of the Jordan River Basin to the favor of Israel whereby “100 percent of the water from the upper Jordan River not allocated to Syria or Jordan will be included as belonging to Israel” (“Rationale for Key Provisions of the Accord” 1-2). That is, Israel is not awarded an allocation as Jordan and Syria were, but all surplus. The Oslo Agreement was nothing more than a “treaty without guarantee, which promised no statehood, no end to Jewish settlements, no return of Palestinian refugees, and – most important of all – no capital in Jerusalem” (Fisk 1). The only peace treaty brokered to the satisfaction of the parties involved was the Egyptian-Israeli

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

While Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy did not just focus on the Middle East conflict, he is most closely associated and remembered for his role in this part of the world because it was his greatest foreign policy success. She believed that the long-term survival, and development of Israel, depended on securing the recognition of its neighbours and establishing some sort of working relation with them. In the years that followed this summit, there were more and more talks that have lead to the relative peace in that part of the world today. Therefore, his international policy and his domestic economic ones were related and in negotiating peace and fighting for human rights in various parts of the world, Carter was acting both on the basis of his own moral principles and on the basis of America’s national interests. The American delegates involved had to rewrite the compromised proposals several times between sessions, before both Sadat and Begin would agree to them (“Camp David: Day by Day” 4-10). To tackle the Mideast conflict and to end the threat of war, Carter and his advisor decided that Egypt should be the focus of their attention as it was the main Arab military force and if it was removed from the Arab-Israeli conflicts, the possibilities of tensions erupting into wars would be reduced. Among the words that Begin objected to were those which demanded Israel’s total withdrawal from Arab lands. Both Sadat and Begin had their reputations and their countries’ futures on the line, not to mention the future of the Middle East (“Camp David: Day by Day” 1). However, as far as Carter was concerned, peace and defense would not be threatened because his world vision was of peaceful resolution to conflicts. In short, he was a man of peace and did try to act to bring the world closer to understanding each other.

Approximate Word count = 3137
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.