How valid is the view that Germany was treated leniently in
The treaty of Versailles was signed on the 28th of June 1919 by the Weimar government. The French, British, and American governments designed the peace settlement in order to place blame on Germany for starting the war. The consequences being that the German government would have to pay reparations, as well as loss of one third of land and most of the colonies. This caused total out rage within the German public, as they had always been led to believe that it had been a defensive war, through propaganda. There is much historical debate over how leniently the German’s were treated in the settlement. John Maynard Keynes supports the view that Germany hadn’t been treated fairly, although facts such as the treaty of Brest-Litovsk point to a more lenient approach. In this essay a full examination of how Germany was treated in the settlement, and if it is a valid view that the settlement was lenient will be given, with close reference to factual evidence and historic debate. The German public were outraged after the signing of the treaty, as popular belief was that it had been a defensive war and in no way was Germany to blame. The treaty was looked upon as harsh and unfair, with a grave humiliation placed over Germany. “Today Germ . . .
In my opinion the treaty was slightly harsh, however in the long run the view that Germany was treated lenient in the settlement is correct. The fact remains that Germany had invaded Belgium while it was still neutral, leading to Britain having to step in due to an agreement, which they had made previously with Belgium. Many argue that the Germans had done a great deal in the war to become black listed with gas weapons, becoming a great threat to all countries. Although demilitarising in the left bank of the Rhine and territory fifty kilometres to the east was included in the treaty of Versailles. Thus crippling her as the removal of Alsace and Lorraine an important industrial area would make it harder for Germany to pay the reparations back. Also if examining the severity of the treaty it is lenient compared to the Brest-Litovsk treaty forced upon Russia by Germany in 1917. The agreement disallowing Germany to ever unite with Austria did have just cause and it can be seen that if it had been allowed then the two powers that had been defeated would end the war larger and more powerful. an honour is dragged to the grave”, one paper’s view on the settlement. Although evidence does show that Germany had been treated leniently during the settlement. Also the restrictions imposed were only in the interests of Europe and the prevention of an other war, through the army reduction to 100,ooo men. To concluded the treaty of Versailles was in some ways extremely harsh on Germany and did drastically change her way of life through loss of land and reparations, which would later lead to hyperinflation. The German foreign minister Brockdorff-Rantza commented that the bases of the treaty, which was to blame Germany for the war was incorrect. Thus causing Russia to lose 9/10ths of her coalmines, half her industries and a 1/3 of her population. “The demand is made that we alone are guilty of having caused the war… such a confession in my mouth would be a lie.
Common topics in this essay:
Versailles Proving, Austria Germany, Maynard Keynes, British French, British American, Russia Germany, Rhineland Germany, Britain France, Germany German, East Prussia, germany treated, pay reparations, treated leniently, treaty versailles, germany treated leniently, treaty lenient, lenient towards germany, treated settlement, view settlement, included treaty, german population, german public, removal alsace lorraine, |