Ethical relativism
Descriptive and normative ethics are quite different from one another. Descriptive relativism acknowledges that various cultures have different values. For example, in parts of West Africa clitoridectomy is quite prevalent. As a descriptive relativist one cannot acknowledge that this particular practice is wrong or right. Normative relativism take on viewing cultures with a different approach. Normative's root word is norm. This word suggests that a norm for a particular culture is right within itself. For instance, in the American culture, certain sub-cultures participate in the act of tattooing. There are laws that regulate underage tattooing or being tattooed without the consent of a parent. It's done mostly for beautification purposes. For someone in Iraq to suggest that the practice is bizarre would be unsound. One reason it is unsound according to descriptive and normative relativism, because it lacks the presence of understanding and tolerance. 2. Both diversity thesis and dependency thesis work hand and hand to define the core of relativism. Diversity deals with the different voices that people have in a particular culture and dependency thesis refers to voice in regard to gender. These both fit into the
Lastly, character encourages human growth and human growth is synonymous to human maturity. Often times in formal relationships or settings our ideas can be different from a person engaging with family or friends. If I take on a position to never say anything adverse about a person's religion, I expect the same respect. Some people are greatly influenced by their parents or out of guilt of their "sinful lives" to attend church. The characteristics of an act may vary. Secondly, rights can't be violated. For instance, a person has the right to believe whatever they want and no one has right to violate that belief. It also seems to give facts about moral diversity far better than any alternate. Ethical relativists seem to encourage more of an understanding and tolerance for various cultures. We as humans like to confer with individuals that have like minds as we do or at least respect who we are as individuals. First of all, it is common for people to digress from conversations with topics of religion and politics to circumvent arguments and heated debates; furthermore, some people keep their conversations neutral. One reason is because the relationship could be negative is if a parent condones their child having a same-sex relationship, stating that it is subjective to the person, it could cause conflict. The reason that I feel that most people would embrace the first argument is because it embraces diversity.
Common topics in this essay:
West Africa,
,
ethical relativism,
characteristics act,
embraces diversity,
core ethical relativism,
characteristics act vary,
various cultures,
act vary,
particular culture,
choose relativism,
normative relativism,
dependency thesis,
moral diversity,
|
Acceptance Essays
