A Justified Criticism of Plato’s “The Republic”
Plato’s “The Republic” has taken the ancient and contemporary world by storm, inciting both birth and death of paradigms concerning the state and society. By that phenomenon, it brought with it a gush of relentless controversy while revealing and yet concealing subjectively realities on the emptiness and incompleteness of human existence. Some may probably have perceived it as a rational approach to politics, some a repression of the free human spirit, while some may probably view it as a mere product of a delusive mind. However the existence of these convictions, each of us must try to take his own stand by examining and weighing its value or even figuring if it does possess any. Taking the tone of the rhetoric, we shall embark on the whole course of this worthwhile journey guided by the question, “could the philosophies presented in Plato’s writing in fact be useful to mankind or should it remain but a far-fetched fantasy nature would never allow to materialize?” For some reason, the form in which Plato preferred to chronicle into account the ideas of his mentor, Socrates, was by the form the dialogue. The discourse opens with a conversation with Adeimantus on the main subject of inquiry—justice. Socrates then suggests how the . . .
A miserable person will have no other input than misery hence the output shall be misery as well. If that small entity is abolished, where else are we to derive those essential human qualities? Teachers, nurses, can only provide a far-off idea of it. Like anybody else, they would need incentives to encourage them to accomplish their tasks. He failed to acknowledge that they are instincts that persistently define themselves even causing the waging of many wars that characterized a multitude of ages. Although he has good motives in preserving the person from debasement and corruption, it is indubitably too injudicious to conclude that such suppression could be the ultimate solution leading to the achievement of this end-goal. This critical assessment is a helpful vessel in conducting the flow of correct insights and in enriching ideas borne by the mind. It is improbable to regard the state as a whole enormous family when no one has had any. Everyone, even farmers ought to be reared in philosophical knowledge and wisdom. concept can, in its full effect, be integrated into a community by mentally conceptualizing the ideal state. Again it is a wonder how someone in the ancient days has conceived something similar in essence with Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory (presence of id, ego, and superego). Because he is miserable, he is likely to effect the selfsame misery upon the state he is governing. What pain it would be not to be able to keep what you love and love what you own! Although it is possible for a person to love and hold concern for anyone in the community, it would definitely be impossible to love them equally. It is yet more plausible to conceive what is achievable and real for as goes a popular adage, the smallest good deed is far, far better rest than all the world’s great intentions.
Common topics in this essay:
Platos Republic, Sigmund Freuds, Henry Maslows, Kings Philosophers, Kings Subjected, definition justice, platos republic, ruler living, |