Compare and contrast of juvenile and criminal justice system
Juvenile Justice Vs. Adult Justice System Juvenile justice system is different in many aspects when charging a juvenile compared to an adult offender. In the following paper the court process will be assessed with its parts which are alike and which aspects are different. The juvenile justice system is a highly confidential and closely watched process. In the following information an overview will be described. The first step of detaining a juvenile is when law enforcement receives information of a juvenile committing crime. Once law enforcement conducts the investigation, a determination is made as to whether there is enough evidence to find the juvenile guilty of a crime. Law enforcement will then send the information to the to the juvenile probation office and then to the district attorney who will investigate and file the petition (Imhoff, 2004). During the filing of the petition the juvenile may be: 1. Counseled and released to parents.2. Referred and diverted to community resources such as social services.3.Cited and referred to juvenile intake. Released to parents.4. Transported to Juvenile Hall or shelter. The next step in processing a juvenile is to cond
It is the same as the initial arraignment- to re-read the charges being brought against the defendant, to re-evaluate the bond if needed, and have the defendant enter their plea. Now we will compare and contrast differences of the two court processes. The process of the pre trial hearing the defendant will be offered a lessened sentence for in exchange for a guilty plea. In charging a juvenile they have the choice to charge the defendant as an adult or a juvenile, in criminal you only have one place to be charged. In the juvenile justice field all information and court proceedings are closed to the public. If the verdict is guilty, often times a judge will postpone the sentencing until a pre-sentence investigation is done. In charging young offenders usually 25% of young offenders are dismissed because of first time offenders and minor offenses. This is hearing to determine whether there is evidence beyond reasonable doubt to support the allegations against the juvenile. In the court the state must provide proof beyond reasonable doubt is required in every aspect of conviction. One main difference in the two systems is rehabilitation (Taylor, 2002). The juvenile process of detention is short, because rehabilitation is main goal. On the criminal side the defendant has the choice to representation by the state, hired attorney or self-representation (Imhoff, 2004). In closing the juvenile justice and criminal justice systems are different and alike in many different aspects. Only 1/3 of the US has enacted legislation that grants juveniles a right to a jury trial under certain circumstances (Zack, 1999).
Common topics in this essay:
Parens Patriae,
Court Act,
System Juvenile,
Juvenile Hall,
criminal justice,
justice system,
juvenile justice,
taylor 2002,
juvenile court,
According Taylor,
grand jury,
court process,
criminal justice system,
juvenile justice system,
imhoff 2004,
due process,
probable cause,
criminal justice process,
hand criminal justice,
crime law enforcement,
|