How does one develop personal ethics in a corporate environm
In any business institution, it is imperative that an organizational structure is identified. This eliminates misunderstandings and presents the expectations from the corporation to its hierarchy of works. In Corporate America, depending on the institution, several structural methodologies are adopted as the ideal organizational structure for that particular company. However, coming in to an environment of established rules, and standard operating procedures, an individual brings a new cultural dynamic to the table. Irrespective of the corporate level that individual is placed, their contribution to the corporation is as important as any other member on team. Within Smith & Falmouth's online operations division, the pyramid diagram best describes the formal organizational structure of the corporation. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Irene Seagraves, at the apex of the pyramid, the Chief Operating Officer, next standing, known in this case study as Victoria Boyle-Hebron, then funneling down to the two support teams, the Logistic and Web Development teams, and sandwiching management, the Project Manager, James William Argyle, who directly joins forces with the Logistics and Marketing mangers, Brian Kervor and Adam Searle.
In turn, indirectly providing rules and regulations. The crux of the lawsuit was that the company wanted the team members to endorse a memorandum acknowledging alternative lifestyle in the workplace. Constructing, and maintaining personal ethics in the workplace rests with the individual, and how willing he or she is in assimilating to the evolving cultural dynamic of the corporate world. The aforementioned news story bespeaks of the conflict that is borne out of the misinterpretation and perhaps, the mis-representation of the new policy. As oppose to having one culture working collectively, the subgroups are either acting with or against the group. The plaintiff won an undisclosed out-of-court settlement. Bad ethics are borne out of poor listening. This is to say, that if the member demonstrates a less than tolerant attitude, or interrupts a colleague in a less than professional manner, that member is behaving contrary to the established rules of the corporation. For instance, a news story on National Public Radio (June 30, 2004) tells of AT&T's Broadband Division being sued by an employee who believed that a new company policy violated his civil rights. An executive who lacks decorum in meetings with any staff member would not be best suited to preach the importance of corporate ethics. However, people were influenced by their environment and their social circles, and from a humanistic perspective, the employees had the propensity to work based on the leader of their cliques opinion. The COO of S&F was placed in a position where all parties were drawn away from the individual who was suppose to act as the core of the company. How does this correlate with ethics? Communication plays a central function in every corporation, and one of the key components of communication is listening. However, many theorists may argue that in order to establish rules of ethics in a corporation, the architect(s) of the rules must possess and demonstrate that they are judged by the same standards.
Common topics in this essay:
O'Hair Stewart,
Broadband Division,
S&F COO,
Project Manager,
Irene Seagraves,
Victoria Boyle-Hebron,
Stephen Lucas,
Corporate America,
COO S&F,
S&F Company's,
organizational structure,
project manager,
established rules,
cultural dynamic,
irene seagraves,
brings cultural dynamic,
upper management,
o'hair stewart,
brings cultural,
interpersonal relationships,
personal ethics,
standard operating procedures,
|
Acceptance Essays
