Who is society to decide whether or a human being should live or be killed. Assisted suicide has become a problem around our world in the past decade. This crisis by its proper name of euthanasia has taken our homeland by shock, and it brings about disagreement. The question of suicide has come to the front; it is because of the incredible advances that medical technology has created. Euthanasia is a practice painless putting to death person who suffer from painful, incurable difficult disease. The result of euthanasia will extremely change interaction with physician and patient, family relationships, and the idea of moral actions. In the old times people generally died when their time had come. This is no longer true. Now a days people can be kept alive even when they are know to be emotionally or mentally non-functional. This is caused because of the new medical technology advances. Many questions have been asked by society as to whether assisted suicide is a crime or not.
             Euthanasia is the work of putting a human being to death for his or her own benefit. "When it comes to improving end–of-life care assisted suicide is largely irrelevant" performed Doctor Ezekiel Emanuel of the National Institutes of health. He was the first doctor to track the terminal ill patient opinions on the subject over a number of months (Deadly III. Patients . . .). The basic idea is that a doctor is the one who decides
             whether or not a patient is suffering enough in their current condition that assisted suicide would be the most desirable option. It is proven that people who suffer form such sickness like cancer or AIDS contract a great amount of severe pain. To some doctors and people it seems reasonable to want to put an end to that agony; on the other hand, there are limits to this issue.
             For many people who are detected with being incurably ill, there is one who is an example of faith, firmness and hope on fighting against...