Causes of World War II
When most people look at war the first thing that they usually take into consideration is the destruction, anarchy and casualties, when in reality the most important aspect of war might be the theories of why the war happened instead of what went on during the conflict. These theories can show us many things about the prelude to war and also help us distinguish if the theory in question is the deciding reason that the war began or merely an event or figure that may have helped cause the war but never really had enough significance to incite war alone. Most importantly by examining the theories of why wars start, we as a society can cipher through which theories seem plausible and which ones do not, giving us an idea for future of what precautions we might be able to take to prevent such wars in the future. When looking at wars in particular the Second World War gives us many interesting ideas and theories on how such a terrible event could have happened during our time. In examining World War II closely four major theories on the causation of the war appear as the most relevant, the theory that it was the personalities of the leaders of the warring countries such as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin that lead to war, the differing fo
Many foreign countries tend to point at the United States as the cause of war by relying on the hegemonic stability theory given that they believed since the US was the dominate world power that it was their job to work as the world policeman. Hitler also broke the disarmament agreement and began to rebuild his countries military power, making many countries very nervous and putting some at the tip of war. The next theory that holds importance for cause of WW2 is the idea that the war was caused by economies in the countries. While the first theory those leaders' personalities caused World War II, another theory that needs examination is the theory that the war started because of different countries foreign policies. One weakness of this argument would have to on point that many believe that economy was one of the main reason Hitler was elected even though the majority of his votes did not come from the people most effected the working class. Stalin also helped make countries feel uneasy and hostile when he signed the Hitler-Stalin Pact to divide up Poland between the two making many of European powers begin mobilization. Also many blame the Great Depression for creating social instability within Germany that allowed for the Nazi party to rise as a power. Even though its impossible to completely foretell a war, with right kind of knowledge from the past about plausible theories the chances of war could be greatly reduced. This theory has many strong points especially looking at the fact that some of the most influential events that led to war can be somehow traced back to decisions and the overall aftermath of World War I. This theory should be seen as a necessary condition for war because this was probably one thing that was necessary for the war to start, but not enough, another reason should have also been in place for war to start. Many consider Stalin's ignorance in the decision to ally himself with Hitler a leading cause of hostility in the war because Hitler had basically tricked him into helping his cause only to turn his back on him later. The strengths in this argument lie in the fact that the economic stability of times did make a lot of countries shift their focus on what's important, for example adding to the US isolationism policy, but during this shift in focus many countries lost sight of what was happening else were in the world. One major piece of evidence for this theory lies in the Treaty of Versailles, which was so punitive and harsh on Germany that it caused a great stir up in Germany and fueled a lot of hatred against the countries that imposed it on them. This theory would have to go with another theory of war to make it totally believable, because it's hard to believe this economic crisis alone started to war but it certainly did fuel it.
Common topics in this essay:
War II,
America Europe,
Britain France,
,
France Britain,
World War,
Treaty Versailles,
League Nations,
Poland European,
Britain Frances',
world war,
war ii,
world war ii,
war theory,
cause war,
foreign policies,
theory war,
effects world war,
foreign policy,
countries foreign,
theory falls,
helped cause,
helped cause war,
foreign policies theory,
countries foreign policies,
|
Acceptance Essays
