Gun Control Will Not Prevent Violence
Gun Control Will Not Prevent ViolenceThere is an outpouring cry for more gun control measures to prevent crimes and violence. However, throughout most of our history people have armed themselves for protection against criminals, invaders, and even abusive government. There are approximately four million new firearms - about two million being handguns - sold in the United States each year (8). The regulation of weapons and gun control laws will not solve the problem of violence and prevent crimes. Gun control laws do not work. Just the contrary, legitimate users of firearms submit to intense regulation, scrutiny, and bureaucratic control. Any effort to decrease the supply of firearms imposes damage on freedom and privacy that is fundamental to American life. The Brady bill, implemented in several states, requires a background-check and a five-day waiting period to acquire a handgun. The main accomplishment of this bill is the increase in hassle to the law-abiding citizen seeking a gun. Second Amendment scholar and attorney Stephen B. Halbrook debates the Second Amendment to the Constitution in his book That Every Man Be Armed. Halbrook states the American's right to keep and bear arms grew out of political and phil
There are plenty of statistics reporting deaths or injuries from the use of guns. The conclusions is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicated that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner. Prohibiting guns or intensifying gun control laws will not reduce the source of crime and violence. The ATF reports:Congress declared that its purpose in enacting the GCA was to keep firearms out of the hands of those not legally entitled to possess them and to assist the Federal, State, and local law enforcement to help reduce crime and violence. If more law-abiding citizens were to carry conceal weapons, criminals would be less likely to attack, for fear of death or injury. In addition, Jim Babka, in his article Gun Control Only Seems Like a Good Idea!, he expounds on the 1982 Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution's confirmation that The Second Amendment is to provide protection of an individuals right to bear arms. when a municipality or other government entity undertakes to furnish police services, it assumes a duty only to the public at large and not to individual members of the community. Congress sought to achieve this without placing any unnecessary burden on law-abiding citizens acquiring, possessing or using firearms for lawful activity. It is not realistic to assume police officers will protect individuals against violent crimes.
Common topics in this essay:
Eric Dylan,
Prevent Violence,
Warren DC,
National Guard,
Firearms United,
Kennedy ATF,
Constitution United,
Plato Aristotle,
Scott Columbine,
Act GCA,
gun control,
gun control laws,
control laws,
crime violence,
law-abiding citizens,
bear arms,
police officers,
cry gun control,
potential victim,
restrictive laws,
law enforcement,
brady bill,
|
Acceptance Essays
