Nietzsche
In Treatise Two of On the Genealogy of Morality, Friedrich Nietzsche discusses the origin and development of guilt, and how it stemmed from the relationship that forms between creditor and debtor when a business deal or trade is made. Nietzsche states that man has the ability to make promises; therefore, he also has the ability to keep the promises he made. However, if man fails or forgets to keep a promise he automatically becomes indebted to the person to whom the promise was made, which establishes a creditor and debtor relationship. Due to the notion of repaying, the creditor is placed in a superior position over the debtor, while the debtor fears and respects the creditor, due to the notion of owing. Using their power of being in the position of control, the creditor may go to severe extremes to gain personal satisfaction to feel compensated by the debtor. As a method of causing guilt and gaining gratification for themselves, the creditors would punish the debtor by inflicting pain, taking his personal possessions or family, or causing him embarrassment. Nietzsche believes that, because of their conscience, individuals should feel the responsibility to keep their promises, and societies throughout history have taken meas
Furthermore, using this description of where guilt comes from, I believe the pink group of the simulated society should be guilty. This argument is structured in the style of: If p then q. Nietzsche believes this to be ironic because although Christ's actions were out of love, he unintentionally doomed man to an impossible guilt, which we struggle with ourselves inwardly. this man of bad conscience has taken over the religious presupposition in order to drive his self-torture to its most gruesome severity and sharpness. Nietzsche states that if a debtor is not punished for repaying his debts, he should be guilty. " I agree with Nietzsche's genealogy of guilt, based on the creditor and debtor relationship. " No longer chastised and essentially escaping the obligation of the repayment of what was owed, the debtors turned their suffering inward and began to feel guilt as self-punishment. The pink group represented the privileged nobility of society. However, the pink group never recompensed the building authorities for the materials. " At this level of civilization "punishment" is simply the copy, the mimus of normal behavior toward the hated, disarmed, defeated enemy, who has forfeited not only every right and protection, but also every mercy; in other words, the law of war and the victory celebration of vae victis! in all their ruthlessness and cruelty:--which explains why war itself has supplied all the forms in which punishment appears in history (Nietzsche, 47). Centuries ago, the idea of ancestors became abstract, as they were deified and turned into "gods". Because they were not forced to succumb to penalties, the pink group should be guilty internally as a form of self-punishment.
Common topics in this essay:
Friedrich Nietzsche,
Guild God,
Jesus Christ,
Guilt Treatise,
Modus Ponens,
Book Arguments,
creditor debtor,
ability promises,
building authorities,
pink guilty,
ability promises ability,
owe debt parents,
relationship creditor debtor,
creditor debtor relationship,
debtor relationship,
due notion,
debt guilty,
promises ability,
guilty pinks,
promises ability promises,
true conclusion,
|
Acceptance Essays
