The Dangerous World Without Guns
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Those words make up the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Those are the words our country's founding fathers wrote when the United States of America was just getting started back in 1787. Yet, some people believe we should no longer abide by this law that was laid out for us so many years ago. Can we, as a country, afford to ignore something so important that lawmakers more than 225 years ago found it necessary to include as part of our nation's law? The Brady Center is one group that believes we should limit and regulate gun laws. The Brady Center is the most visible group that is in favor of more federal regulations and restrictions, along with its affiliate organization, the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence (Adams 1). The Brady Center argues that the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution does not guarantee individuals the right to own and carry guns. The National Rifle Association, the most visible group against more federal regulations, responds to the Brady Center's claim by saying that the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution does
" Guns have been a part of our country since the day it was founded. Therefore, the only purpose for which owning and carrying a gun is protected under the Second Amendment is as part of "a well regulated militia," acting on behalf of the national government (Adams 2). This would give more time to do thorough background checks and even leave the criminals who want one now, rather than later, out of luck. Should we ever lose our right to bear arms, we should hold these individuals responsible morally, and perhaps legally, for all the deaths they would cause. There are millions more people here in America than overseas in Britain. Some extreme anti-gun groups, such as the Anti-Gun Coalition of America, are pushing for guns to be outlawed entirely (Hibbits). The theory is that if you make the criminal wait, he or she will have time to decide against committing the crime and think better of it. Some suggestions of these other forms of killing include bombs, knives, and any other weapon (Davidson 42). As James Norell of America's 1st Freedom stated, "Martin was the poster boy for the widespread failure of police to respond to rural crime in any timely fashion, if at all" (39). Guns are inanimate objects and they do not kill people. Finding out who has guns and who doesn't is already available to anybody who wants to know so keeping that information secure isn't possible. He cites home life, family, friends, and activities that kids engage in outside of school as all being much more important factors than gun availability. Armed only with his unregistered shotgun, Martin confronted the men. If guns were outlawed, people would have no adequate form of protection from others. Norell went on to point out that it was because the burglars know the slow response time of the police and know who has a registered firearm, that they pick their targets (40).
Common topics in this essay:
Brady Center,
Supreme Court,
Coalition America,
Norell America's,
Tony Martin,
Inc NRA,
Thomas Jefferson,
United America,
Officers Authority,
United Constitution,
brady center,
supreme court,
bear arms,
gun control,
guns outlawed,
own carry,
law-abiding citizens,
gun ownership,
own carry guns,
ownership restricted,
adams 1,
gun ownership restricted,
amendment united constitution,
|
Acceptance Essays
