Why a zero tolerance policy is too extreme for professional
In the United States and around the world, athletics are considered a staple of culture dating back to ancient Greece. The athletes participating in competition are considered icons that represent their city, state, and even their entire nation. This admiration of athletics stems from our basic human instinct of competition, and every athlete that competes wants to be the best at what they do. By being an athlete one carries the burden of expectation set forth by the average citizen, who by no means can dunk a basketball, or throw a one-hundred mile an hour fastball. Fans watch these sporting events as if they were part of the team. For example, if you asked any Red sox fan who won the World Series last year, they would simple respond, "We did." The connection fans feel with their favorite team is not simply on a geographical level, but also on an emotional level. The tension of a close game, the hope of a victory, the helplessness of defeat, and the immense joy of winning, are all examples of what makes athletics so great, and why athletes are set on such high pedestals. This pressure, however, can influence athletes to try anything for that extra edge, even if it is cheating. The most common form of cheating in sports
If a zero tolerance policy was in place, his career would be over, and he would never be aloud in a ball park again, all because of a mistake he didn't know he was making. Baseball was reestablished as the national past time. However, if a zero tolerance policy were in place the hope would be lost. By removing this player from the league, a piece of the fans attached to that team would leave with the athlete. The Steroid scandal reached new heights with the release of Jose Conseco's book "Juiced. Steroids may have increased the spectacle of the game in the late 90's, but they also brought with them a dark cloud which hovers over every professional baseball player today. The common used phrase by fans after a losing season is, "There is always next year. The integrity of baseball as our nations past time is not past the point of salvation. During the suspension the athlete would not be aloud to workout with the team, and would be required to undergo a weekly drug screening. I feel this policy would be just as effective as a zero tolerance testing policy. This random testing should be carried out in the same manner as in the NFL, where players are randomly tested each week from every team. " In his book Conseco list players he came into contact with over his sixteen year career who he personally saw take steroids. To become an elite athlete takes countless hours of practice, and preparation. Those are just four of many all-star caliber players who have either admitted using steroids, or have had testimony brought against them while under oath. I feel the most efficient compromise would be a one year suspension without pay on the first offence.
Common topics in this essay:
Randy Wolf,
Mark McGuire,
World Series,
Grand Jury,
Jose Conseco,
,
Castillo NFL,
United Baseball,
Florida Marlin's,
Attendance Database,
zero tolerance,
zero tolerance policy,
tolerance policy,
major league,
testing policy,
positive steroids,
national past,
using steroids,
testing positive,
mark mcguire,
policy effective,
major league baseball,
mark mcguire sammy,
mcguire sammy sosa,
performance enhancing drugs,
|
Acceptance Essays
