In theory, Congress was developed by our founding fathers to be an efficient system of legislators working together to create laws. However, due to misrepresentation of minorities and women, a dysfunctional system of pork barrel politics, and a congressional process which is designed to be slow and carefully looked at, but sometimes Congress tries to act too quickly making costly mistakes for our nation.
First off, although law making is the principle business of Congress, members of Congress do much more than just make laws. In fact, Congress are supposed to represent the American population. However, with the way present day Congress is set up, it is nearly impossible for Congress to be equally representative. With that said, Congress is unrepresentative in that it doesn’t mirror the diversity of the United States.
Since congress is dominated by white males, it is fair to say that congress just cannot be responsive to the needs of other races, as well as women. In fact, in 2002 the House of Representatives had in office 59 women, 38 African Americans, 22 Hispanics, and 4 Asians. The numbers are even lower in the Senate, having only 13 women, 0 African Americans, 0 Hispanics, and 2 Asians in office. Congress must have a go
So many of these programs created by Congress are "born to fail," because they are not focused on the society as a whole but rather on what a certain interest group desires at the moment. Secondly, as well as misrepresentation among women and minorities, Congress is also a corrupt and dysfunctional system due to the increasingly high amount of pork barrel politics involved in Congress. However, there are some factors that hinder Congress to work the way the founding fathers intended. Critics of the Patriot Act felt hat this bill is a direct violation of the civil liberties which have built our nation to what it is today. Moreover, given that members of congress should be a body which represents the nation proportionally, in all reality, Congress is a truly unrepresentative body, which does not mirror the diversity of minorities and women living in the U. A recent example of this was the passing of the Patriot Act, which was put into power shortly after the attacks on 91101. Because Congress members have much less compelling incentives to consider the consequences of their activities for the larger more general interests of the country, ideas supporting national good is damaged. Congress members in both the House and the Senate feel that the bill wasn"tmt appropriately discussed on the floor. In this process, a black candidate can be elected only where blacks are a majority of the electorate. " The reason these counties claimed that they were depressed was to try and get the federal subsidies this program offered, even though they were not in need of it. Passing a bill into a law is a long and careful process of decentralization, which is due to the fact that power is dispersed in several areas of Congress. This again goes along with pork barrel politics, and how Congress members continually try to "bring home the bacon" to their constituencies. So what happens is that Federal Programs are not targeted to the needy or focused on the people who actually need the program. Congress tends to defeat and distort national interests in pursuit of satisfying its constituency. With that said, this is a clear example why congress should be a proficient method of policy making, but in reality, it can fall short and fail.