Social Function and Classification
            
             In the high middle ages, what a person did for a living did not always determine there social classification. There were three different social classes, but they were not always so boldly separated. There were those who fought, prayed, and worked; and under these were more subclasses.
             For the workers, there were two subclasses, serfs and slaves. They were both hard workers on the farm except that one could achieve freedom and one could not. Serfs only had one way to buy their way out; giving money to a third party to buy them only to let them go free, although most serfs could never get their freedom. Slaves, on the other hand, could not be, they could only work.
             Priests and monks fall under the clergy class. Priests were sometimes considered peasants and were often poor. Many times the priests would help the peasants work the field. There were, however, the high-priests who lived in nobility. There were also the monks who had a life mission to serve and pray.
             And the highest class was those who fought. The nobles were the knights, although not all the knights were nobles. The knights were those leading the army; however you also need the foot soldiers. The foot soldiers were not as wealthy as the knights, or as high in class, but were considered in the noble class all the same.
             So there were three social classes but many social functions. People back in the high middle ages did not believe they were categorized into three social classes. Even though there were many subclasses were not widely separated, function did determine social classification; all with the exception of some of the lower clergy, which blend with the peasants.
             ...