While walking the path of life, travelers must ask themselves whether they were destine to walk a specified course laid before them, or if their surroundings subconsciously direct them free of fate. The idea of fate is an interesting concept; it is predetermined yet many times it cannot be proven or predicted. However, various applications of predetermination can be predicted. One such idea that applies this sense of predetermination is The Bell Curve. The argument of The Bell Curve suggests that depending upon the race of an individual they are predisposed to having either a lower than average or higher than average Intelligence Quotient also known as I.Q. This Intelligence Quotient indicates a person's mental abilities relative to others of the same or different ethnicity and similar age group. Everyone has hundreds of specific mental abilities, if measured accurately can be used as reliable predictors of academic and financial success. "In America today, you are much better off knowing a child's I.Q. score than her parents' income or education if you want to predict whether she will drop out of high school." according to Race, Genes and I.Q, an Apologia article. The concept that I.Q. scores are affected by race and ethnicity is highly supported. However, "ethnic differences in measured cognitive ability have been found since intelligence tests were invented. The battle over the meaning of these differences is largely responsible for today's controversy over intelligence testing itself." (Herrnstein and Murray, 1994)
             The suggestion that race and ethnicity determines I.Q scores highly contested throughout the science community. There are countless online blogs, debate sessions, and persuasive works that have tackled this topic head on. They oppose The Bell Curve due to its racist roots and counter those beliefs with their own theory of how I.Q. is developed. Even to this day people are still disputing the conc...