Athletes - Role Models or Monsters?
With the increase of media coverage over that last few decades, the responsibilities of professional athletes have become much greater than simply sports related. These men and women have been exposed by the media in good and bad ways, but it seems that their true stories are sometimes being flipped just in order to create a more interesting situation. I find this attention and athlete's behavior work together in multiple ways. Whether the media is showing a good deed by a great person or exposing the flaws in another's personality, professional athletes are constantly being examined under a microscope by the world. Athletes seem to be working as much to be role models as they are to win games, and it sometimes just isn't fair. As Americans find themselves obsessing over professional sports today, the teams and athletes that we seem to love so much aren't always the positive role models that we want our youth to be looking up to. All athletes shouldn't be obligated to become role models to the people they perform in front of; they should simply be obligated to be performers. A role model is someone that people can look up to and it is a tremendous responsibility, a responsibility that shouldn't rest on the shoulders of
An article from the Los Angeles Times explains his faults in the league as it says, "Then there is the other side of Barkley, the person who said he wasn't a role model, who has been arrested several times for public altercations, who spat at a heckler in Philadelphia, missed and hit a 14-year-old girl. We should only worry about their performances in the games they play. This is why these men and women need to be extra cautious with each and every move, but some still aren't able to handle it. They follow the standards laid out by most Americans, that athletes should be able to control themselves and their actions on and off the field. There are however, many professional athletes that our youth and anyone for that matter can look up to as a role model. This shows a negative role model because the fame and glory has gotten to the athletes head, and they aren't willing to give back to the people who helped get them there. Charles played in the NBA from 1984 until 2000 and in that span of time he was criticized to the point that he admitted that he just was not a role model. Robert Kohls states, "In the United States, people consider it normal and right that Man should control Nature, rather than the other way around. Basketball may have found its role model. Joe's star Jameer Nelson, who enters the NBA this month, was a father to his team and is a father to his little boy. Robert Kohls it talks about American materialism as it says, "But by any standard, Americans are materialistic. In this article from The Washington Post, a man agrees with my viewpoint as he says, "It's the way they play on the court, and if that's the way you want to play. " This could mean that an athlete should have control over what happens in every day life and should be able to compose themselves well enough not to be criticized and humored by the press. As an article from The New York Times by Arn Tellem says, "Athletes are nothing more than entertainers. " These men represent more than outstanding jumpers or shooters, but great people in general.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Robert Kohls,
Kohls United,
Tim Duncan,
Halle Berry,
Angeles Times,
Allen Iverson,
Jameer Nelson,
Washington Post,
Charles Barkley,
role model,
role models,
professional athletes,
negative role,
negative role model,
athletes shouldn't,
athletes able,
unfair role,
charles barkley,
st joe's,
expected role,
unfair role models,
expected role models,
|
Acceptance Essays
