The Conflict of Gene Therapy
The Conflict of Gene Therapy Gene therapy is the treatment of certain disorders, especially those caused by genetic anomalies or deficiencies, by introducing specific engineered genes into a patient's cells. It is a fairly recent technological advance in the medical world and because of this, it has undergone severe criticism. Gene therapy has been classed in the same realm as cloning and designer babies in terms of moral and ethical issues. The genetic engineering of genes has proved to be successful against sickle cell in mice, itrepairs errors in messenger RNA, and it could possibly treat cystic fibrosis and some cancers. Within medicine, any advance is cause for disparagement and conflict. This conflict can either push or dissipate any argument for successful drugs or treatment. Ibelieve this conflict has pushed gene therapy to be looked at more thoroughly and thisgenetic theory will cause social change. Any new process has its guidelines and in medicine, those guidelines come fromthe FDA or Food and Drug Administration. As of July 9, 2004 no human gene therapy product had been approved for sale. Most experiments are currently just investigational
Cloning has had its own struggle with world-wide institutions; church, family, andgovernment. Gene therapy is by no means readyfor dispersal, but arguments both for and against the testing has changed the way societyaccepts the theory. The medical society mightview gene therapy as fatalistic or too much regulation. This is the same situation that many scientists, researchers, and others are going to have to deal with if they are not already. Is it moral? Is it ethical? These arequestions that are now being raised even though gene therapy has not been officiallyapproved for treatment. To go along with non-material culture is the concept of social facts; ideas,feeling, and ways of behaving that exist outside the consciousness of the individual. Again, this conflict pushes more inquiry into the theory and inevitably becomes social change because of it. The outcome of each experiment contributes tothat social construction, whether it is beneficial, harmful, etc. This conflict, or difference of opinion, spawns new theories and newtrials that gene therapy can be introduced to; this is advancement for social change. Conflict, in all aspects, changes views and opinions. Too much or too little of both can be detrimental to society and societal views and social change evolves from both. Since moral and ethical talks are brought up more with general public, this social life is an important agent for social change. We might not be able to physically identify with the theory, butit is shaping the culture both inside and out. Approval for new treatments and new drugs must come from the government and departments such as the Food and Drug Administration. These social facts cannot be controlled, throttled, or changed and because of this, conflictthat exists outside the consciousness of the individual is an inevitable fact of social life; this too will either permit or prevent the advancement of gene therapy and cause socialchange.
Common topics in this essay:
Administration July,
Drug Administration,
Therapy Gene,
Suicide Theory,
gene therapy,
social change,
view gene therapy,
view gene,
social life,
moral ethical,
social construction,
inevitable social,
inevitable social life,
engineered genes,
Food Drug,
public view gene,
social construction reality,
construction reality,
material culture,
conflict inevitable social,
|
Acceptance Essays
