Liberty and Justice for All
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This comes from Article XIV of the United States Constitution. As a citizen of the United States, we expect to be treated equally, to be guaranteed the same rights as every other citizen, but such an expectation is undermined for many people in America, especially within the gay community. This great country has flourished largely because, until now, we have upheld our reputation as being a country of equality, but here we stand today at a crossroads. As a country we are to decide whether these people are to be guaranteed the same protection as every other citizen or deny them these rights. We are also to decide whether or not to pass an amendment guaranteeing the rights of homosexuals in marriage. As a citizen of the United States who will be part of this decision, I find it in everybody's best interest to pass this amendment and give these people the same rights as every other citizen. Homosexuals are citizens of the United Sta
These costs fall into three categories: administrative, health, and moral. In a 1995 study, accommodating the gay and lesbians at work has actually saved employers an average of $10,000 in increased productivity and reduced costs of workers' compensation, other insurance, and finding and training new employees (Sobelsohn 113). Another part was added to the title of the policy after the death of Winchell. First they say, "Law expresses a society's values, and so has great symbolic power" (Sobelsohn 116). Unfortunately there have been many reported violations of this policy. tes of America and their sexual preference should not wave their rights. Every day our country benefits from homosexuals and it is our duty to make sure they are protected to ensure they continue to help this great country prosper. They are ensuring that our children and our families are safe one day longer. We have created amendments stating that we will not judge you upon race or gender, so why stop there? We should continue with our promise "liberty and justice for all. So by covering only sexual orientation, job bias laws actually ignore sexual behavior and focus on attraction or inclination. Also people that use religion as an excuse to ban same-sex marriages, how does that work? Many say that God prohibits same-sex marriages, but how do they prove that? Can one really prove that God said that two people of the same-sex cannot be married? But even within biblical texts that address homosexuality, it can be argued that "what is referred to, especially in the New Testament, under the rubric of homosexuality is not the same reality at all or that the biblical authors do not manifest the same understanding of that reality as we have today. They are especially concerned that if a homosexual's job involves working with children that their children will be exposed and more likely to partake in something they consider immoral. Our military cannot afford to lose over a thousand people a year due to discrimination. They feel that passing such a law would encourage behavior many people find immoral. They are going off to war to fight our battles for us.
Common topics in this essay:
Scripture McNeill,
Anderson Osburn,
AIDS HIV,
Rights Act,
Don't Tell,
United Constitution,
United America,
Don't Harass,
Fisher Winchell's,
Don't Pursue,
sexual orientation,
same-sex marriages,
civil rights,
gay lesbians,
don't tell,
gay lesbian,
policy means,
anderson osburn,
ban same-sex marriages,
discrimination takes people,
law bring,
limit discrimination takes,
job discrimination,
sexually abuse children,
argue gay sexually,
|