The right to use physical violence
The use of physical violence towards other people is usually taken by the general public as an act of aggression with negative connotations. However, there are times when the use of violence is a necessary action when there are no other alternatives available to being unjustly treated. Three philosophers, John Locke, Karl Marx, and Thomas Paine, believed that only through physical violence could a better social order be created. This paper will seek to defend and justify the application of physical violence against other people through the works of these three thinkers and conclude by revealing the context of violence through economic, political and social patterns. In John Locke's civil society, the people submit natural freedoms to the common laws of the society; in return, they receive the protection of the government. By coming together, the people create an executive power to enforce the laws and punish offenders. The people entrust these laws and the executive power with authority. When, either through an abuse of power or an impermissible change, these governing bodies cease to represent the people and instead represent either themselves or some foreign power, the
He published his Two Treatises of Government anonymously in 1690. Some say that Britain has protected America, and therefore deserves allegiance, but Paine responds that Britain has only watched over America in order to secure its own economic well-being. Thus, the proletariat will lead a revolution. After the first battle of the war, Paine began to argue that the American colonists should seek complete independence, rather than merely fighting to free themselves from unfair British taxation. Paine argues that America is sufficiently small as to be united now. Escape from this alienation requires a revolution. Locke defines tyranny as "the exercise of power beyond right. This process represents the "march of history" as driven by larger economic forces. Paine adds that if the Americans revolt now, they can use the vast expanses of uncharted land to the West in order to pay down some of the debt they will incur. Government, on the other hand, is an institution whose sole purpose is to protect us from our own vices. In order to prosper in the long term, the colonies need to be independent. They commissioned Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who had recently become members, to write a manifesto on their behalf, soon known as the Communist Manifesto. Paine says that the colonies have little to gain from remaining attached to Britain. These include: sanctity of the executive; faith that laws will prevent necessity of force; and the fear that a small group of individuals will never overthrow powerful leaders with success.
Common topics in this essay:
John Locke's,
Independence Society,
Modern Industrial,
Friedrich Engels,
Europe America,
Thomas Paine,
Common Sense,
Britain America,
Manifesto Marx,
Declaration Independence,
paine argues,
complete independence,
communist manifesto,
karl marx,
civil society,
common sense,
thomas paine,
physical violence,
sole purpose protect,
locke defines,
attached britain,
marx friedrich engels,
karl marx friedrich,
|
Acceptance Essays
