Why Funding for Art Education is too Low
Why Funding for Art Education is too LowMany public schools have significantly reduced or completely cut funding for art education programs. Officials at state or city levels may feel the need for art education is not as significant as the need for more academic based programs like mathematics, history and science. Officials see art education as something that is impeding on their student's academic careers, rather than helping them flourish. Many who argue against funding arts education need to take a closer look at what art education does for a child.At a School Board meeting, Mr. Whyte (1996) first heard an argument against art education in schools:"A well-dressed, well-spoken woman stood to complain that children graduating from schools were inadequately prepared to take their places in an ever more demanding labour market. Too many resources and too much instruction time, she maintained, were wasted on frills like music. Not enough attention was being paid to math and the sciences, computers,
This is an important part of education. What they fail to recognize is that music actually raises these test scores, due to the increase in mathematic and problem solving skills. Music taught in schools raises grades, test scores, general intellect, and self esteem. Standardized testing has become the "golden rule" of school systems in the curriculum taught. and technology, which she cited as the future keys to employability (p. For example, they are teaching "third grade studying language arts create original poems with a write-in-residence and learn how to choreograph a dance to go with their verses (Kantrowitz, 1997, p 71). The problem is that schools keep cutting music programs due to "low budgets". " The emphasis on academics is indeed important. By funding these teaching methods and standardized tests, schools become accredited and therefore eligible to receive more funding for the school. Music can capture feelings, and help a musician know and understand their own feelings. Public school systems should apply more funds for art education programs because; art education helps students develop thinking, social, and personal skills. Children are required to learn the curriculum and pass these tests in order to meet the standard of knowledge, or even to graduate. School Officials in North Carolina are taking positive steps to include art education in every subject.
Common topics in this essay:
School Board,
North Carolina,
Education Low,
Heights York,
California Irvine,
art education,
test scores,
standardized testing,
funding art education,
art education programs,
funding art,
school systems,
education programs,
math sciences,
education schools,
public schools,
whyte 1996,
|
Acceptance Essays
