Morality of revenge
Imagine a student studying a work of William Shakespeare, namely Hamlet. This student wonders whether or not he should take revenge on his little brother for destroying his favorite toy. He decides to analyze further the characters of Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras in the Shakespearean play Hamlet in order to help in making his decision. In the Shakespearean play Hamlet; Shakespeare illustrates how the morality of revenge leads to the downfall of Hamlet and Laertes and the success of Fortinbras.The benevolent character of Fortinbras demonstrates how his good moral decisions leads to his success. Fortinbras' decision to follow his uncle's orders not to attack Denmark shows to the audience that he is a very moral character. In the beginning of the play, Prince Fortinbras prepares to attack Denmark but withdraws after receiving orders from his uncle, the King of Norway. Although Fortinbras was contemplating revenge for his father's death, his good moral decisions prevent him from attacking Denmark, which would otherwise be his future throne. Later on in the play, young Fortinbras follows through with his choice of attacking the Polish instead of the DanesHamlet encounters the captain who informs him that the army is headed to
Laertes' decision not to support his sister through their father's death is also a contributing factor to his sister's suicide. Also, Claudius would not be alive to plot against Hamlet himself to kill him. Laertes' moralistic choice to tell Ophelia to avoid Hamlet has repercussions on his own life and on Ophelia's life as well. In short, the selfish decisions made by Laertes leads to his end. The effect on Ophelia causes her to commit suicide, as she no longer has Hamlet to support her and also considering that her father is also dead. Hamlet's impulsive decision to follow his father's ghost is the onset to his lunacy. Laertes' rash decision to have revenge on Hamlet eventually leads to his death. Lastly, Hamlet's decision to expose Claudius' guilt through the play leads to other disastrous events culminating to his own end. " Fortinbras decision of not attacking the Danes, will in turn, affect the outcome of events, which will lead to his crowning by HamletMoreover, after Fortinbras' victory against he Polish, his decision to come visit Elsinore later concludes to his throning In fact, after the battle Hamlet has just went through and later hearing of Fortinbras arrival at the castle, Hamlet declares Fortinbras the next king of Denmark Hamlet himself saw the benevolent and honorable character of Fortinbras and so saw him fit to be the next king. Hamlet's hasty choice of stabbing whoever was behind the arras is one of the many stages which will lead to his downfall. This is the spark to Hamlet's deceiving madness which will thereafter leads to others being hurt and later affecting him as well. Furthermore, the impulsive moral decisions that Laertes makes, will, in the end, lead to his ruin. Lastly, Laertes' decision to conspire with Claudius to have revenge on Hamlet eventually leads to his and Claudius' downfall. After analyzing the outcome of Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras, he decides not to have revenge on his little brother and instead makes peace with him.
Common topics in this essay:
Hamlet Laertes',
Denmark Furthermore,
Hamlet Laertes,
Lastly Hamlet's,
Polonius Claudius,
Norway Fortinbras,
Danes Hamlet,
Denmark Hamlet,
Moreover Fortinbras',
William Shakespeare,
father's death,
hamlet laertes,
revenge little,
revenge hamlet,
moral decisions,
shakespearean play hamlet,
success fortinbras,
suicide hamlet,
commit suicide,
downfall hamlet,
laertes success,
hamlet laertes success,
causes commit suicide,
downfall hamlet laertes,
laertes success fortinbras,
|
Acceptance Essays
