Napster

The Record Company is strongly opposed to Napster for one reason and one reason only. Apparently, the record companies are losing more and more of the market to Napster file sharing on the Internet. Record companies justify their lawsuits against Napster with the line so often used in press conferences, “Napster breaks copyright laws.” This phrase seems like a legitimate argument. One could understand the

. . .
People have the right to listen music of their choice as much as they have the choice to read and watch whatever they want. The record companies seem to feel the opposite way. Should we begin charging people to watch Much Music or to listen to the radio? Where would the line be drawn?

The record companies have maintained fixed prices on albums for years to avoid competition with one another and now that they have some competition they are “crying foul. It is a person’s right to have access to music on the Internet as they do with information. Should Dave have the right to sue the person who copied his product? Most people would say yes. The people who use Napster are by far in favor of keeping it open. If Napster shuts down, what is next? Radio? Television? Censorship of the Internet? Is the public just going to stand by and watch these large corporations toss a blanket over the people’s heads and raid their pockets? I feel it is up to the consumer to decide if he or she wishes to support the record companies and other large corporations; however, I will never buy another CD for the rest of my life as long as record companies continue to squeeze every penny from the music loving public like a sponge and continue to ignore the real intention of music. Rage Against the Machine is a very political band and are not hesitant to voice their opinions about the greed of corporate America and the record business. The bands’ revenue comes mostly from live shows, appearances and endorsements. I think it is safe to say that the record companies have formed an alliance against Napster because of the greed which powers the American economy. Also, the user feels that he/she is breaking no laws when using Napster since no one is making money when a song is downloaded. Should a person be charged with copyright infringement when recording a song from the radio, or burning a CD of all their favorite songs? There has been no discussion of shutting down radio or banning CD burners so why is Napster so different? Napster users download files from one another for personal use. Dave watches his sales plummet and, of course, feels cheated.

Common topics in this essay:
Dre Metallica, Internet Record, Napster Napster, , Rage Machine, Censorship Internet, record companies, Record Company, Rock Napster, support napster, market napster, rage machine, Dr Dre, bands support napster, record companies feel, file sharing, people napster, majority bands, napster file sharing, shut napster, dr dre metallica, music music, record companies napster, napster money,

Approximate Word count = 1350
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here