dbq essay on farmers
The complaints of Native Americans, western farmers, and African Americans in thelater 19th century are the result of too little government action. When problems began toarise in the West, only then did the American Government hastily find even moredisputable solutions. The government did not attempt to aid the Indians, farmers, orAfrican Americans before there situations became worse enough to definitely needfixing. Also when the government made their decisions, they were only beneficial forone side and not the other. All that the Indians, farmers, and African Americans wantedwere their own shares of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the natural rights When President Andrew Jackson applied the Indian Removal Act, he believedthat the lands west of the Mississippi would permanently remain "Indian country." Butthis was proven false as wagon trains rolled westward on the Oregon Trail. Also plansfor a transcontinental railroad were in progress. Because the national government took"little" into consideration of the future of the Indian Removal Act, more problems arose. The federal government began to assign the plains tribes large tracts of land, or
During Reconstruc-tion, federal laws shielded southern blacks from local and state discriminatory acts. Ferguson, the Supreme Court upheld a Louisiana law requiring "separate but not equalaccommodations" for white and black passengers on railroads. Farmers sent their products all over the countryin order to receive profit, but it was virtually impossible to ever make any money whenthe charge for use of the railroad system, was more than the farmer could make. It was believed that if there was a large amountof money circulating it would make high prices, and eventually the farmers would beable to pay off their debts. Finally, another major cause of discontent for thefarmers was the deflation of prices. ""The object of the Fourteenth Amendment was undoubtedly to enforce theabsolute equality of the two races before the law, but, in the nature ofthings, it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based oncolor, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or acommingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either. It came to a halt when the Wabash v. In the end farmershad nothing to show for their hard work. "But because this case occurred right after the civil war, the case must be looked at in thecontext of its time. Supreme Court began to deny one Reconstructionact after the other. the troops were sent into our country, and the troops killed our peopleand ill treated them, and thus war and trouble arose; but before the troopswere sent there we were quiet and peaceable, and there was nodisturbance. As John Harshall Harlan says:"Our Constitution is color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classesamong citizens. Thegovernment tried to help out by establishing the Sherman-Anti Trust Act, and theInterstate Commerce Act.
Common topics in this essay:
African Americans,
Removal Act,
Purchase Act,
Commerce Act,
Supreme Court,
Dawes Act,
Fourteenth Amendment,
Mother Nature,
Crow Laws,
Civil Rights,
african americans,
farmers african americans,
supreme court,
farmers african,
government action,
help farmers,
interstate commerce,
sherman-anti trust act,
deflation prices,
indians farmers,
indians farmers african,
trust act,
court ruled,
interstate commerce act,
indian removal act,
|
Acceptance Essays
