dbq essay on farmers

later 19th century are the result of too little government action. When problems began to

arise in the West, only then did the American Government hastily find even more

disputable solutions. The government did not attempt to aid the Indians, farmers, or

African Americans before there situations became worse enough to definitely need

fixing. Also when the government made their decisions, they were only beneficial for

one side and not the other. All that the Indians, farmers, and African Americans wanted

were their own shares of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the natural rights

When President Andrew Jackson applied the Indian Removal Act, he believed

that the lands west of the Mississippi would permanently remain “Indian country.” But

this was proven false as wagon trains rolled westward on the Oregon Trail. Also plans

for a transcontinental railroad were in progress. Because the national government took

“little” into consideration of the future of the Indian Removal Act, more problems arose.

The federal government began to assign the plains tribes large tracts of land, or

. . .
During Reconstruc-

tion, federal laws shielded southern blacks from local and state discriminatory acts.

Ferguson, the Supreme Court upheld a Louisiana law requiring “separate but not equal

accommodations” for white and black passengers on railroads. Farmers sent their products all over the country

in order to receive profit, but it was virtually impossible to ever make any money when

the charge for use of the railroad system, was more than the farmer could make. It was believed that if there was a large amount

of money circulating it would make high prices, and eventually the farmers would be

able to pay off their debts. Finally, another major cause of discontent for the

farmers was the deflation of prices. ”

“The object of the Fourteenth Amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the

absolute equality of the two races before the law, but, in the nature of

things, it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based on

color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a

commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either. It came to a halt when the Wabash v. In the end farmers

had nothing to show for their hard work. ”

But because this case occurred right after the civil war, the case must be looked at in the

context of its time. Supreme Court began to deny one Reconstruction

act after the other. the troops were sent into our country, and the troops killed our people

and ill treated them, and thus war and trouble arose; but before the troops

were sent there we were quiet and peaceable, and there was no

disturbance. As John Harshall Harlan says:

“Our Constitution is color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes

among citizens. The

government tried to help out by establishing the Sherman-Anti Trust Act, and the

Interstate Commerce Act.

Common topics in this essay:
African Americans, Removal Act, Purchase Act, Commerce Act, Supreme Court, Dawes Act, Fourteenth Amendment, Mother Nature, Crow Laws, Civil Rights, african americans, farmers african americans, supreme court, farmers african, government action, help farmers, interstate commerce, indian removal act, deflation prices, court ruled, indians farmers african, fourteenth amendment, indians farmers, sherman-anti trust act, interstate commerce act,

Approximate Word count = 1196
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here