Cloning
Cloning humans has recently become a possibility that seems much more feasible in today's society than it was twenty years ago. It is a method that involves the production of a group of identical cells or organisms that all derive from a single individual (Grolier 220). It is not known when or how cloning humans really became a possibility, but it is known that there are two possible ways that we can clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloning a human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that particular person. With these two methods almost at our fingertips, we must ask ourselves two very important questions: Can we do this, and should we? There is no doubt that many problems involving the technological and ethical sides of this issue will arise and will be virtually impossible to avoid, but the overall idea of cloning humans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future.Biotechnology holds the promise of longer, healthier lives. Whether it is better treatments for diseases s
This might sound like the trailer for a science fiction movie, but one should know that there is evidence that people are already trying to do some pretty scary things through biotechnology, more specifically through cloning. uch as cancer and Alzheimer's or disease resistant crops that may help eliminate hunger around the world. Some of the most powerful people in the world have felt compelled to act against this threat. We should at least allow this to happen because if we never explore the risks then we can never enjoy the benefits. As a result Cloning should be illegal because it is degrading to humans. One should not just brush this aside and count on it never happening, because the potential outcome is so dangerous that we need to act as if it could happen tomorrow. We are more than the sum total of our parts. It also creates a family puzzle; imagine if an infertile couple was to produce a clone of the male partner in order to have a child. What if someone is able to scramble a person's genetic coding and create a superhuman? What if parents started picking the color of their child's hair and eyes, his or her IQ, height and talents before they are even born? Or, what if individuals were discriminated against because their DNA indicates that they are predisposed toward mental illness, alcoholism or homosexuality. This preceding idea is the one presented throughout the Washington Post editorial "Don't Clone People". Cloning treats humans like guinea pigs. We should be excited that we are able to duplicate such a complex sequence of genes. Today, the topic of cloning generates more argument then it has ever created before. The article backs up it's evidence by stating that, whether successful or not, the fact that someone may even be trying to clone a human should be terrifying to everyone and should make us sit up and take notice. Just suppose a dying child needs a bone marrow transplant and the family could not find a compatible donor.
Common topics in this essay:
Clone People,
Cloning Cloning,
Campbell Scottish,
Washington Post,
human cloning,
cloning humans,
don't clone people,
Don't Clone,
clone human,
don't clone,
clone people,
creating individuals,
clone humans,
diseases cancer,
body organ,
washington post,
|
Acceptance Essays
