The Mad Revisionist
The Mad Revisionist's "The Parthenon: A Post-Hellenistic Fabrication" is an interesting piece, of which there are many different arguments are made in order to prove "that there is no apparent evidence that (the Parthenon) was the majestic temple which the authorities claim." The Mad Revisionist is an individual who puts an extraordinary amount of effort into poking fun at Holocaust revisionists, but, at the same time, he also indirectly poses another intriguing question: What if this is true? You cannot completely ignore revisionism, even though much of what they argue may appear to be 'inaccurate'. The Mad Revisionist uses a variety of techniques and a heavy dose of sarcasm in order to accomplish this feat. There are also dangers that accompany this 'branch' of history, the foremost being the possibility that there is truth to these theories.The Mad Revisionist uses a number of different techniques to prove his Parthenon fabrication theory. They range from simple sarcasm to finding a weakness in the story and blowing it wide open, not unlike a crack in the sidewalk. For example, the Mad Revisionist, when delving for an answer to th
If this is the case, then it could have major repercussions throughout not just history but all of society. As for the Revisionist's final technique, it is one used throughout this essay, as well as the Mad Revisionist's website, sarcasm. Mind you, this also raises the issue that revisionism might not be dangerous; it might just be the truth. His methods only attempt to disprove what other people have worked hard to prove; they have never shed new light on any part of the Acropolis or Parthenon. This, however, leads to another technique used by the Mad Revisionist: the fact that the evidence is controlled by the so-called "establishment" , where 'experts' are shepherds to our sheep, we "blindly trust that they would never lie to us. The argument is one that is based on a pure lack of fact and is propped up by a variety of logical techniques, which serve no purpose, but to confuse and obscure the "truth". Another technique utilized by the Mad Revisionist is that he takes a simple, unimportant idea and makes it seem utterly important to the entire fabric of the 'hoax'. When referring to the Parthenon display at New York's Metropolitan Museum, which he recognizes as a 'fake' right away, his 'further research' opens one's eyes to the fact that "several of the sponsors of this exhibition had suspiciously Greek-sounding names. There is any number of examples of sarcasm throughout his text There are only two dangers than can be associated with the revisionist history of the Mad Revisionist. " Is the excuse 'flippant', or is it credible? I am sure, with a little more research, that one could see that the sources used to establish this point are credible. Many people can view the Mad Revisionist in many different ways; Mainly, he is a fool, albeit an educated one. What a flippant excuse to explain away such glaring lack of evidence.
Common topics in this essay:
Mad Revisionist,
Roman Empire,
Metropolitan Museum,
Revisionist Mainly,
Parthenon Acropolis,
Acropolis Parthenon,
Mad Revisionist's,
Post-Hellenistic Fabrication,
mad revisionist,
technique mad,
mad revisionist's,
technique mad revisionist,
|
Acceptance Essays
