Get immediate access to thousands of

 high quality papers and essays.
Mega Essays Home  |   Questions?  |   Acceptable Use  |   Customer Care  |   Site Search
    Enter Essay Topic:

   

    Subjects:
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology

    Login:
Member Login
Join Now!
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

Hannibal

For those interested in seeing Hannibal, you’ll find greater enjoyment of the movie if you avoid comparing it to Silence of the Lambs, its smashing predecessor. Hannibal has a different style, altered tone, and a sweeping change in story emphasis. In short, it’s bigger, simpler, and a bit more predictable. That being said, director Ridley Scott (in his Gladiator follow-up) brings on an effective, sometimes faulty, marginally successful thriller. Just don’t expect to be knee-deep in the mind games of Jonathan Demme’s superior 1991 classic.

The action picks up some months after Hannibal "The Cannibal" Lecter’s escape from that homey, isolated cell in Silence of the Lambs. He has fled to Florence, somehow conniving his way into a position as a museum curator, where he can cultivate and brag about his knowledge of the arts, most notably works depicting brutal hangings.

. . .

Unfortunately, the movie itself is not as comprehensive. Jonathan Demme approached Silence of the Lambs from a rich, thought-provoking angle that reflected his usually offbeat sensibility; Ridley Scott directs Hannibal much like he helmed Gladiator, or even Alien: there’s a good guy, bad guy, big setting, conflict, and smash-em-up ending. That’s a major trip-up in the script, where the motivation for action is sacrificed in the name of just cutting to the chase. And he also contacts Starling again, continuing their unique game of cat-and-mouse.

Anyway, Lecter (the slithery Anthony Hopkins, if you didn’t already know) somehow ends up back on the FBI’s Most Wanted list. ack in the US, FBI agent Clarice Starling (a very capable Julianne Moore, slipping nicely into Jodie Foster’s creation) is in boiling hot water for the botched arrest of an HIV-positive drug lord, and feels her career slipping away as a result.

Julianne Moore does a fine job of inhabiting the role of Starling, affecting a slight twang, appearing sad, yet determined, and displaying that clean, hard-working look that Foster had. She soon meets with Mason Verger (Gary Oldman), a wounded, deformed man with lavish wealth, who is hell-bent on capturing and torturing Lecter by making him swine meal. Remember the grisly images of Silence of the Lambs? You can’t because there weren’t any. Veteran screenwriter David Mamet (State and Main) and rewrite man Steven Zaillian (Schindler’s List) compile a tense, witty script, but holes like this are apparent. Which is unfair, because it’s certainly ample entertainment. ) Does it all come together? Kind of, but not as well as it could. Hopkins remains a treasure to watch and listen to, especially as Lecter: his visible contempt, crisp diction with that slight femininity in his voice, and confident quick motions, complete the picture of this complex, delicate man.

Common topics in this essay:
Silence Lambs, Schindlers List, Anthony Hopkins, Gary Oldman, Foster Hopkins, Julianne Moore, Jodie Fosters, Gladiator Alien, Scott Gladiator, Giancarlo Giannini, silence lambs, ridley scott, julianne moore,

See the rest of the paper. Join Now!

Approximate Word count = 605
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here

Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900



CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE



Get immediate access to over 100,000
high quality term papers and essays!!!

Webmasters make $$$!



All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC
All rights reserved. DMCA NEW