United Nations Security Counci
Does veto power have a future in the United Nations Security Council? Perhaps the answer to this question would become clearer if it was reformatted to reflect the true question that lies at the heart of this matter. Will the major powers' that possess veto power relinquish that authority for the sake of the greater development of a less centrally dominated, more egalitarian United Nations which would be more suited to become the central actor in international law and order? Although this analysis of the issue of veto power in the UNSC may seem harsh it is essentially the truth. The removal or at least the modification of the veto power would only lead to power being shared between a larger number of UN member countries. It would also likely lead to quicker and greater action taken against regimes that commit human rights abuses and other violations of international law. Although this would lead to a better UN which would be far more capable of acting as the chief facilitator of international law the political ramifications of eliminating the veto and the loss of direct power experienced by the major powers that hold the veto prevent any reform from taking place and will likely continue to prevent reform in the future. The best w
The independent committee would have to have members from the current veto holding countries as well as a number of neutral countries. The feature of consistent evaluation every five years is also important. The greatest problem that this is leading to is the abuse of this great power for purposes of national interest rather than global improvement. Clearly the veto should not have a future in the UNSC however its reform will depend on the political will of the US, UK, and France to advocate a reform. However, with the removal of the single veto system power would no longer be absolute and rejection of a motion would have to be supported by more than one country. It is time that these countries are only granted the power that they deserve and no more. It is apparent that in light of such abuses to the veto reforms must take place in order to further strengthen the UN. Countries like China and Russia are clearly not as powerful as in the past yet they still hold veto power. Before one can realize the political ramifications of removing the veto it is important that the power that is connected with the veto be fully understood. For instance, the 1999 Kosovo crisis was not supported by the UNSC even though it seemed pretty clear to the international community that human rights abuses were taking place. It must not come across as a measure for ensuring greater equality in the UNSC but rather as a strengthening of the UN and international law. The US has a number of other ways for wielding their power over the international community (i. The single veto system which is used today offers the countries that posses it the supreme authority to single-handedly stop any proposals that the UNSC is considering. By not reforming the UNSC the organization will remain stagnant and will increasingly be viewed as an obsolete organization.
Common topics in this essay:
United Nations,
China Russia,
UN Reforming,
UN Assembly,
Security Council,
United Kingdom,
UK France,
UNSC UN,
china russia,
international law,
veto power,
human rights,
,
single veto,
veto system,
international community,
rights abuses,
human rights abuses,
veto holding,
single veto system,
removal single veto,
prevent reform,
countries china russia,
current veto holding,
|
Acceptance Essays
