The dangers of Conglomeration
English Composition 1 - Paper#4: Persuasion:Nowadays, people never stand still to think about the quality of the information that they absorb. The consuming of daily news has become a very important factor in our everyday lives so that most of us just accept what we read and don't look for anything else. I have time and again found out that there is more to a lot of stories than we would actually deem possible. It is in a way, as an aspiring journalist, important for me to encourage my equals to grasp the situation. I feel that everybody is entitled to hear everything, even though this might be harmful to a company or embarrassing to a government. It is due to this that I am now trying to target other aspiring journalists to cry out against the ever-dominating factor of commercialization of the media. Money is an important issue, I am not denying that we cannot live without it, but the media is slipping more and more into the control of certain groups, thus risking bias and the retention of news. At this time, approximately twelve large conglomerates control the so-called First World media, as stated in several media textbooks (Vivian 24-25). This means that all the newspaper, television, radio and Internet compa
In every article that they are going to write in the near and far future, they must speak the truth and not just a silly distorted version of what other people want to be the truth. The thing that I want all of these people in question to do, is to write, speak and act out against what is happening to our media. These examples are only a few of numerous others. I am quite sure that a lot of my predecessors also had ideals in their beginning years, and that they all wanted to change journalism in order for a true free press to exist, and that after having obtained a nice salary, they quickly forgot about it. What did it imply? CBS didn't give its program "60 Minutes" the authorization to air a report on the tobacco industry, because it was too petrified to end up in a liability lawsuit. However, I am not out to fight for a true free press. Why? Because the BBC was openly offensive to the Chinese government, and Murdoch wanted dearly to stay in the Chinese government's white book by doing what he did. Above all, the owners of these large conglomerates have adopted a pure and utterly financial attitude towards the management of the media companies that they own. It is unfair that those who actually stick their heads out always get their heads chopped off. Another aspect that is very negative in the modern day media is that there is a lot of discrimination between the stories. It is due to this that they aren't open to any form of criticism, and that they are more in favor of the increased commercialization of the media because it means an increase of revenues to them. The argument given for them not airing the program was that it would be too expensive! A similar argument was made at ABC, which apologized, to the Philip Morris Company when faced with a potential ten billion dollar libel claim. Another great example is that Rupert Murdoch, the great English media tycoon, dropped the BBC channel from his Star satellite news service in China. Having said all this, I also desire that such a challenging task as the one I have set about to persuade all of you out their to be entrepreneurs with you words, written and or spoken, will certainly be rewarding.
Common topics in this essay:
Columbine School,
Persuasion Draft,
China BBC,
Olympics China,
Murdoch English,
Electrics NBC's,
Morris Company,
Journalism Review,
Bob Costas,
English Composition,
true free,
industry trying enter,
journalists write,
aspiring journalists,
commercialization media,
free press,
aspiring journalist,
indirectly linked,
china didn't,
true free press,
trying enter,
television radio,
|
Acceptance Essays
