Initiative 200
Affirmative Action Under Attack by Initiative 200? Affirmative action is under heavy attack by initiative 200, and it should not be. It should not be under fire because it serves as an act of restitution for the discrimination and hurt that we have caused African-Americans and other minorities throughout this century. It is our job to repair and repay blacks because our performance in the past has immediately affected their present status. Americans, especially white males until late, were not opposed to affirmative action. This is only because affirmative action primarily benefited white males. It was the privileges our colonial fathers established on the basis of race and gender that allowed white males to dominate the job market with little or no contention. Some even believe that affirmative action is preferential treatment for white males. White males have used race consistently in two ways since the Civil War: for the purpose of inclusion and exclusion. They have used race inclusi
However, in American labor history, whites have often begrudgingly recognized that they needed black labor. Obviously, if a group is excluded from key economic and educational opportunities in a society, it will remain at the bottom of the class hierarchy. In such a system, notice that the denier is preferred and receives preferential treatment. Consequently, they d not be able to compete for the more-prestigious, well-paying occupations. Given this recognition, the issue became to deny blacks equal policies made certain that blacks remained at the bottom of the labor market. Clearly, by denying one group accesses, more opportunities are available for the go that is in the position of power. In the present, however, affirmative action, though still based on race and gender, is used to include those who in the past were excluded. In more precise terms, with today's affirmative action, or preferential treatment, we are attempting to adjust for the imbalances of the past that have been carried on into the present. Starting with Jim Crow laws in the South, and later with the 1896 Plessy vs. Ferguson Supreme Court decision, statutory discrimination became the la of the land. To deny a group access is to guarantee that that group ill not has the resources to qualify itself to compete wit a group that has not been similarly denied. Since the Civil War and up to the 1954 Brown vs. All of this seems so intuitively obvious, so why then can't most Americans understand why affirmative action is obligatory? I believe the answer is as follows: Americans have refuse to recognize that there is and empirical relationship between the past and the present. In the past, white males were preferred. They refuse to recognize that understanding the effects of past discrimination on the present is the key to explaining why affirmative action is not only needed in the present, but is the moral and political responsibility of so-called Christian nation.
Common topics in this essay:
Supreme Court,
Civil War,
Attack Initiative,
affirmative action,
African Americans,
Jim Crow,
white males,
Board Education,
preferential treatment,
labor market,
affirmative action affirmative,
attack initiative 200,
action affirmative action,
action preferential treatment,
refuse recognize,
blacks equal,
civil war,
equal access,
initiative 200,
affirmative action preferential,
race gender,
|
Acceptance Essays
