Music censorship
Is there a need for Censorship on Music Lyrics?Music, mainly concerning rock, metal, hip hop and rap genres are constantly under controversy because of their lyrics which regularly contain either sexual, violent, racist or offensive language. While arguers claim that it is unsuitable for the general public, observing that it has the potential to corrupt the minds of the general public in our society today. In spite of this, those opposing to the idea of censorship on music, protest that lyrics should not be censored; to silent out expletives or the make it inaccessible, is to withhold the musicians' right to freedom of expression.Most of the Singers and songwriters along with their supporters such as the producers, record companies and listeners oppose to the notion of censorship because it is restraining the musicians from freedom of expression. They are all stakeholders in this battle to fight against censorship on music. Publicists and Advertisers have also taken part of this dispute because they promote the musicians to their target audience and this argument against censorship is mostly due to their target audience-the youth. Then there are the watchdog groups, the Broadcasting Standards Au
We should not allow others decide our own 'morals' or ' beliefs' and allow the minority of people who possibly committed murder, rape or did drugs because of the music they listened to dictate the lives of the majority in our society. Censorship restricts freedom of expression, yet some people believe that censorship on music is 'for the good of the public. 'Stan,' also by Eminem, is about the effects of music lyrics, about somebody who genuinely believed in Eminem's lyrics; Stan kills his pregnant wife and then himself after listening to his idols' music. The effects of listening to violent lyrics are not exactly clear, psychiatrists at the American Psychology Association (APA) believe the young persons concerned are influenced by these lyrics because they are at an age when they cannot make informed decisions but are in the process of developing their own opinions. It seems that we are using musicians as a scapegoat for our fault in exposing unsuitable material to adolescents and then brainwashing the general public into believing that if music were censored, our world would not continue to destroy itself. Contrasting Ideas / Opinions and the effects of their ramificationsThe musicians which are often in the middle of the debate, such as modern singers of rock, metal rap and hip hop usually have a target audience of young adults, individuals whom are at a time of vulnerability. Their behaviours change, they dress, act and talk differently but accordingly to the genre they are interested in. Eminem shows the potential effects of music. Consequently, it is hard to deny the need for censorship, especially when there has been studies conducted and now suggest "Violent lyrics in songs increase aggression related thoughts and emotions and could indirectly create a more hostile social environment. Television on the other hand, has the help of visuals. On the contrary, it contradicts the initial and popular belief that listening to aggressive lyrics in music was healthy, serving as a helpful catharsis for individuals. "1 Whether they were lyrics presented in a humorous or serious context, according to their study, violent lyrics promote feelings of hostility. Besides, it is only insulting to our intelligence when the opponents think we should be told what to and not to do. Nevertheless, both are equally easily accessible.
Common topics in this essay:
Publicists Advertisers,
Association APA,
Inch Nails,
Contrasting Ideas,
Context Music,
Conclusion Arguers,
Sedate' Zealand,
Hip Hop-gotta,
Stakeholders Singers,
Hip Hop-stand,
censorship music,
music lyrics,
freedom expression,
violent lyrics,
effects music,
'my mind's sedate',
record companies,
'my mind's,
mind's sedate',
singers songwriters,
publicists advertisers,
freedom expression stakeholders,
producers record companies,
send subliminal messages,
|
Acceptance Essays
