Terrorism: A Universal Misconception
Terrorism: A Universal MisconceptionTerrorism is potentially one of the most misunderstood ideologies of modern history. It is such a broad and unique belief system that one could write entire books on it. And due to its distinctiveness, it must be treated very carefully. Contrary to this, "terrorism" continues to be used wherever and whenever it suits an individual, a group or a nation's agenda. This must be stopped in order to resolve terrorism, and the first step in this feat is to understand it. If terrorism continues to be generalized to such extreme levels as it has been, solutions to reduce or eliminate it will never be established. Therefore we must look beyond the common misconceptions and understand what terrorism truly is.In a new age of terrorism, where "the term "terrorism" itself has been used in so many different senses as to become almost meaningless," it is absolutely essential to understand what actually constitutes terror. And this understanding is nearly impossible. Terrorism is, "the policy of using acts inspiring terror as a method of ruling or of conducting political opposition" states the Lexicon Universal Dictionary. This definition itself, which should remain unbiased, suggests that political vi
This argument goes beyond the notion of one man's freedom fighter is another's terrorist, but to the policies which certain countries imply against terrorism, such as the U. Most if not all terrorists use the fight against repression and injustice as a mask for their campaigns. Although terrorism is a complex issue for which a proper definition will forever be disputed, the basic tenets of it can be broken down into several key points according to historian Walter Laqueur:"1. " At times, this definition is applicable, but often, such as in Lebanon in 1983, foreign countries do not fight terrorism, but rather become implicated in civil war. Many nations across the globe would like to believe this and some certainly do, such as the United States. This is a quick, easy and cost efficient way in which one could "gain the kind of significance that most likely could not be gained by legitimate channels. In fact, not all political violence is terrorism and this assumption was generated again through neglect and generalization. , as they often force nations to pick a side in conflicts, which are often civil wars, and then denounce all acts of violence as terrorist actions. This trend continued through much of the 20th century. Political significance is a very difficult goal to obtain through legitimate practices. Terrorism is a response to injustice; if there were political and social justice, there would be no terrorism. Terrorism is one of the most important and dangerous problems facing mankind today. Therefore, the analyses which follow are challenges to these generalizations on terrorism which are not only representative of their author's view, but also of the opinion of many people. This is common, especially with the U.
Common topics in this essay:
Walter Laqueur,
Revolutionary Movement,
ALN ERP,
Israel Palestine,
Misconception Terrorism,
Angeles Times,
American Administration,
Latin America,
Thomas Sowell,
Universal Dictionary,
political violence,
political violence terrorism,
violence terrorism,
response injustice,
terrorism response,
civil war,
understand terrorism,
terrorism response injustice,
terrorism isn't,
terrorism political violence,
terrorism violence,
terrorism political,
terrorism continues,
response injustice terrorism,
|
Acceptance Essays
