The Case Agaisnt the Death Pen
This article was written by Eric M. Freedman, and was printed in the USA Today, magazine in March of 1997. Let us start right there with Mr. Freedman. Since this article appeared in the USA Today I assumed that this man was probably one that knew what he was talking about and probably well respected among his peers. He is a professor at Hofstra University School of Law where he teaches Constitutional Law and the Death Penalty. He has addressed many panels of lawyers, prosecutors, judges and even Congress about the death penalty. He graduated from Yale University and is a prominent First Amendment fighter. Now, after all that research I assumed that what I was about to read was going to be some cold hard facts about capital punishment. After all he appears to be extremely well versed about the Constitution and the death penalty. Since I discovered that he was a professor at Hofstra University I decided to do a slight background check on that particular school because I had personally never heard of Hofstra. Come to find out Hofstra University, according to US NEWS, is ranked number two in the country when it comes to law. Hofstra is currently
A person is either found guilty or not guilty. They could be a whole committee of opponents of the death penalty, who furthermore only show findings that they agree with. The final "fact" that Freedman uses is that eventually the death penalty will be inflicted on the innocent. He reminds the reader that death is final and can not be reversed. The death penalty is a form of punishment designed to dispose of extremely violent criminals. Freedman may be quite qualified in the ways of our judicial system he used many so called "facts" to try and persuade his audience. However, he did something a little different this time and questioned his own numbers. " Then directly after the first paragraph he says that in September of 1995, the state of New York re-instituted the death penalty and that this only meant that "New Yorkers will get less crime control than they had before. He made sure to let me know that it was full of people who are well versed in the judicial system. However, the word innocent will not be found in any trial. Now, after proving that one wrong my confidence in Mr. However, I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt and said that we all can make mistakes. Which for me meant that I was going to have to do more research to help break this essay a part.
Common topics in this essay:
Texas Freedman,
Report York,
Ted Bundy,
Death Penalty,
Crime Report,
Hofstra University,
Bar Association,
death penalty,
Yale University,
Eric Freedman,
Chicago Detroit,
fbi uniform crime,
crime report,
found guilty,
uniform crime,
reduce crime,
judicial system,
fbi uniform,
hofstra university,
police officers,
uniform crime report,
agree death penalty,
pg 48,
tell death penalty,
opponents death penalty,
|
Acceptance Essays
