Campaign Finance Reform
Money has been the main issue said to be corrupting politics, and the useof money in campaigns is not said to be in the best interest of the Americanpeople. Campaign Finance has been out of control in the recent political races. Candidates are taking money from wherever they can get it. The "soft money" is going into elections without any type of care. The people or businesses makingthese contributions usually don't have the typical views on issues and candidatesend up representing the wrong people. Money seems to decide races, and thissometimes leaves the better man who spends less money out of a position. Candidates usually make decisions based on what will help them and what isbetter for the people. Contributions by corporations are not made in the interestof the people, hurting them in ways they don't even know. With this occurringcampaign finance reform is needed to keep our country fair in politics. Corporations who usually make the largest donations to campaigns don'tshare the same views as many Americans. Politicians will listen to the peoplewho give them money so they can depend on that money always being there. The issue with these people having more p
and oilcompanies with the Republicans are just a few more examples. By eliminating these corporate contributions the politicians would not be affectedby the outside interests and would be free to do what is hopefully best for thepeople. Politicians will probably eventually only work for thosewith money if it isn't reformed. Food companies are really just one of many examples that canaffect all of us. This shows the differences in interests amongcorporations and the American people. ower in government than the peoplewith less money is taking away from the equal opportunities for everyone andthat is wrong. 58 percent of campaign donors want to see less control over the businesses andcorporations of America. As a groups we did research on what other options could be done to dealwith this problem and we found one solution we took some consideration in. The cares of the people will not be taken into account anymore justcares of being reelected and this would possibly lead to a corrupt government. A candidate have a chance, wouldhave to turn to business and wealth just to win. For one example, food companies have donated $45 milliondollars on the promise by candidates, that once in office will not make stricterregulations on e-coli protection. Corporations make up a large portion of the groups that give the largedonations. Foreign relations with the democrats, the N. Because when a corporation makes a donation, they haveto make up for that money somehow. But because of the donations by foodcompanies, government will not regulate these companies to protect the healthof all people.
Common topics in this essay:
Americans Politicians,
Campaign Finance,
Robert Borosage,
Reform Money,
campaign finance,
campaign finance reform,
people money,
finance reform,
corporate welfare,
american people,
food companies,
businesses corporations,
stricter regulations,
political races,
care people,
|
Acceptance Essays
