Pop Music - Not Progressive as Once Thought(TM)
The 1980s brought a new generation of fads and trends that changed the whole world, and most trends were set by the music industry. People emulated the style their favorite stars put off and were basically following everything a music star would do. This kind of praise for a music star has been going on for many decades, even back in the 1960s with The Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band and the new “mod” style. Also, Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and The Doors are credited with the hippie lifestyle back in the 1960s and early 1970s. Yet, as time passed from the 1970s to the 1980s, music seemed to become more about which advertisers could capitalize the most on popular stars instead of the true meaning behind the words and what the music stood for to the artist. Music grew less progressive and more commercial from the 1970s to the 1980s due to the onset of the MTV generation, media propaganda, and the money hungry music industry. Since the launch of MTV in August of 1981, music changed from the freedom of artistic expression to advertisement filled commercialism. An example of this would be that when in the 1980s, some felt that the average music video would lose the music and be mo . . .
As he says, “It's the appearance of diversity, but without it”. " Now, you might do it for good reasons. Another case of media hypocrisy would be when Jorge Gutiérrez mentions that the only reason people have the musical tastes that they do are because of radio/video airplay, that how many times a song is played and how well it does sets off “copies” of the artist who sang the song. His “Revolution”/Nike controversy also showed that this was a corporate sellout, just to make as much money as they could by showing a commercial that people could relate to musically instead of both musically and visually. With the industry and insider journalists, music genres of the 1980s were in general, one huge sellout at the expense of the artists, the joy of the industry, and the unfairness to the listeners worldwide. All of these events took place from 1982 to 1987, the years that made MTV pivotal. This explains the reasoning as to why new wave bands were so abundant in the 1980s, because music sales of a popular genre would bring in a great deal of money to the industry, even if the industry itself knew that the new wave era would only last a few years. The problem with these bands is that they are not popular enough; they are not what the music industry thinks people would go for. But the ultimate logic here, the trajectory, is right out of what makes the music great in the first place. A lot of artists probably say, "Look, this'll help us do more concerts or maybe make our tickets cheaper, because this is helping us out. Through MTV, commercialism brought more money to the stars and the music industry then could have been imagined, but for the wrong intentions. It was a good idea to capitalize on the whole situation, and it is still worth it today, yet the whole trade should highlight some of the more struggling artists of today. This shows ignorance on the part of the trade, because not everyone wants to convey the same musical tastes, but sadly, that is what it has come to recently. re focused on the story, image and style that improved the look of the music star or stars (Torr 192).
Common topics in this essay:
Media PropagandaTM, South Bronx, Pearl Jam, University Illinois, Madonna Prince, MTV August, MTV VH-1, Jorge Gutiérrez, Joplin Doors, , music industry, mtv commercialism, tv commercial, 1970s 1980s, 1980s music, music industry people, music star, industry people, true meaning words, michael jackson, media propaganda, popular music, pepsi tv commercial, springsteen pearl jam, |