DDT- A problem
The controversial use of DDT has been common place in the late 19th to early 20th century. As many pesticides started, their costs were overlooked by the out-weighing benefits. DDT has both advantages and disadvantages that cohere to its history. The advantages being that of controlling malaria and other insect causing diseases. Meanwhile, the disadvantages are that of harming animal populations, specifically the marine community and birds. Not to mention causing cancer in humans. The history behind DDT is rather prevalent. It was discovered in the late 19th century, but dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane's (DDT) insecticidal property wasn't discovered until 1948. The credit for this discovery was given to Paul Muller when he received a Nobel Prize in medicine for his findings on DDT. As stated earlier, it was used to controlled malaria and other tropical-disease outbreaks all over the world. It was cheap and effective. Little did people know that it was a cancer-causing agent in the making. It worked like a charm for many farmers that used it haphazardly on their crop. In and around the 1960's, Health officials started to notice harmful effects directly related to the use of DDT. In some fish, it had
The direct way was the immediate handling of the pesticide. This by which the DDT was sprayed over a crop, rain runoff would spill into a body of water containing DDT, within this process a worm ultimately got infected by it, then a fish ate the worm continuing the infection. If animals are the factor to look after, they would definitely be effect by DDT. Or maybe such bird populations as the osprey of Long Island. Also the fact that it's a worldwide problem creates more confusion. Its population was on the verge of extinction because of the heavy spraying of DDT on Long Island years ago. Why should we risk increasing our chances of getting cancer when we can prevent that from happening? If in fact DDT isn't banned, there should be some criteria that decide whether or not a country should use DDT. DDT is still used today in some 23 countries, among them being in the continents of South America, Africa, and Asia. The way humans got infect was by direct and indirect means. edu/acad/scicom/SciNotes/9601/Sealion/00Intro. Here are some of those factors that should be considered:Probably the most important factor that should be taken into account is the notion of population. The fact that South America is spraying DDT is absurd. In my opinion, we should ban DDT worldwide for the simple fact that it causes cancer. html2) "The Case for DDT: Science News Online, July 1, 2000"-http://www. You wouldn't want to extinguish some of the most precious and rare beetle collections in places as Madagascar.
Common topics in this essay:
Nobel Prize,
Africa Asia,
DDT Island,
Tough Decision-Making,
South American,
South America,
Online July,
Debating DDT,
Cons Pesticides-,
Destroy Disregarding,
south america,
weak immune systems,
immune systems,
harmful effects,
rain forest,
causing cancer,
weak immune,
result ddt,
late 19th,
tough decision-making,
spraying ddt,
|
Acceptance Essays
